Notice u/s 252(1)(a) of Income Tax Act 2025

724 views 3 replies

• A notice has been issued by ADIT (Investigation) u/s 252(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 calling for information relating to FY 2023–24 to FY 2025–26.

• The information sought pertains to periods that were otherwise governed under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

• The notice cites powers under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for requisition of information, while for non-compliance it proposes penalty u/s 465(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

• The notice was dated earlier but was actually received on the compliance date itself, resulting in no effective opportunity to respond.

• Further, the notice is not reflecting on the assessee's e-filing portal.

Queries:

Whether the Investigation Wing/ADIT can invoke section 252(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 for calling information pertaining to FY 2023–24 to FY 2025–26 where the underlying transactions fall in periods governed by the Income-tax Act, 1961?

Whether issuance of notice under the new Act and simultaneous proposal of penalty under section 465(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 creates any jurisdictional or procedural defect?

 

Replies (3)
Quick Summary
Discussion on validity of a notice issued by ADIT under Section 252(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 2025 for periods governed by the 1961 Act. Members debated possible procedural defects, jurisdiction issues, delayed service, and whether to contest the notice on technical grounds or merits.

The notice appears legally challengeable because:

  • it invokes powers under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for periods governed by the 1961 Act,
  • simultaneously refers to penalty under the 1961 Act,
  • was allegedly served only on the compliance date,
  • and is not reflecting on the portal.

These collectively provide substantial procedural and jurisdictional defence grounds. However, the safest approach is:

  • raise detailed objections immediately,
  • seek adjournment,
  • and avoid complete non-compliance while contesting validity.

Thank you so much sir...

I dont think there is any jurisdiction defect. Section 465 of the new act covers this. Not advisable to fight on jurisdiction grounds before DDIT. Fight on merits. 

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

CA Darshita Shah & Co

Nadiad

CA

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
Accounts & Taxation Executive

Dindukurthy & Associates

Hyderabad

MBA

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Accountant

Global Image Technologies Private Limited

New Delhi

MBA

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant - GST & Direct Tax

APL

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
20 June 2026
Assistant Accounts Manager

Fintax Professionals

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
25 June 2026
AUDIT MANAGER

JDAS & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
2 posts Article assistant and Articleship completed students

Chirag N Shah & Associates

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details