Notice u/s 252(1)(a) of Income Tax Act 2025

939 views 3 replies

• A notice has been issued by ADIT (Investigation) u/s 252(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 calling for information relating to FY 2023–24 to FY 2025–26.

• The information sought pertains to periods that were otherwise governed under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

• The notice cites powers under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for requisition of information, while for non-compliance it proposes penalty u/s 465(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

• The notice was dated earlier but was actually received on the compliance date itself, resulting in no effective opportunity to respond.

• Further, the notice is not reflecting on the assessee's e-filing portal.

Queries:

Whether the Investigation Wing/ADIT can invoke section 252(1)(a) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 for calling information pertaining to FY 2023–24 to FY 2025–26 where the underlying transactions fall in periods governed by the Income-tax Act, 1961?

Whether issuance of notice under the new Act and simultaneous proposal of penalty under section 465(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 creates any jurisdictional or procedural defect?

 

Replies (3)
Quick Summary
Discussion on validity of a notice issued by ADIT under Section 252(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 2025 for periods governed by the 1961 Act. Members debated possible procedural defects, jurisdiction issues, delayed service, and whether to contest the notice on technical grounds or merits.

The notice appears legally challengeable because:

  • it invokes powers under the Income-tax Act, 2025 for periods governed by the 1961 Act,
  • simultaneously refers to penalty under the 1961 Act,
  • was allegedly served only on the compliance date,
  • and is not reflecting on the portal.

These collectively provide substantial procedural and jurisdictional defence grounds. However, the safest approach is:

  • raise detailed objections immediately,
  • seek adjournment,
  • and avoid complete non-compliance while contesting validity.

Thank you so much sir...

I dont think there is any jurisdiction defect. Section 465 of the new act covers this. Not advisable to fight on jurisdiction grounds before DDIT. Fight on merits. 

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
Featured 16 July 2026
Semi Qualified Company Secretary

Vakilsearch.com

Chennai

CS

View Details
Company
29 June 2026
ACCOUNTANT

SANDEEP AASHISH & CO

Araria

B.Com

View Details
Company
20 July 2026
Senior GST Executive

Chandak Agarwal & Co

Mumbai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
21 July 2026
Chartered Accountant

Keshri & Associates

Thiruvananthapuram

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 July 2026
CA Article

Pipara & Co. LLP.

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 July 2026
Senior Executive/ Manager

H S SHARMA AND CO

Pune

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 July 2026
Articleship

Jawahar and Associates Chartered Accountants

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 16 July 2026
Article Assistant

G A R U D & Associates

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details