Under GST, adjudicating authorities cannot issue demand orders for tax, interest, or penalties that exceed the amounts specified in the original Show Cause Notice (SCN). This principle, enshrined in Section 75(7) of the CGST Act, upholds the taxpayer's right to a fair hearing. Numerous court rulings have confirmed that any demand beyond the SCN's scope is invalid, even if the excess is minor, protecting taxpayers from arbitrary or inflated demands.
Introduction
One of the most litigated areas under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime is the validity of demand orders passed by adjudicating authorities. Time and again, taxpayers have faced a peculiar situation where the quantum of tax, interest, or penalty demanded in the final order far ex
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Broadcasts
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited Articles Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
No, under Section 75(7) of the CGST Act, the amount of tax, interest, and penalty imposed in a demand order cannot exceed the amount specified in the Show Cause Notice.
The legal basis is Section 75(7) of the CGST Act, which is rooted in the doctrine of audi alteram partem, ensuring taxpayers have the right to be heard on the specific allegations raised in the notice.
Such an order is considered invalid and can be quashed by courts because it violates the taxpayer's right to defend against the proposed demand and exceeds the authority's jurisdiction.
Yes, Indian courts have consistently quashed demand orders that go beyond the scope of the Show Cause Notice, protecting taxpayers even when the excess amount is small.
Taxpayers should carefully scrutinise the SCN and the final order, invoke Section 75(7) of the CGST Act, and consider challenging the order at the appellate stage or in higher courts.