CS Lalit Rajput
Quick Summary
The Gujarat High Court has delivered a significant judgment, restricting the Income Tax Department's (IT Dept) ability to initiate reassessment proceedings under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, based solely on inputs received from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) Department. The Core Ruli
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Broadcasts
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Articles Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The Gujarat High Court directed the Income Tax Department not to initiate reassessment proceedings solely based on input received from the GST Department. The IT Department must independently apply its mind and analyse the data.
The core ruling states that a notice under Section 148A cannot be issued merely because the GST Department provided information about alleged sales under-reporting or ITC mismatches. The Assessing Officer must conduct an independent inquiry.
The Assessing Officer must analyse the GST data, corroborate it with income tax records, establish a prima facie belief that income has escaped assessment under the IT Act, and record these reasons in the show cause notice.
Taxpayers can challenge Section 148A notices if the IT Department hasn't demonstrated independent verification and a reasoned conclusion about income escapement. It curbs 'fishing expeditions' by the department.
The ruling clarifies that the IT Department cannot act merely as a 'forwarding authority' for GST data. Information sharing must be supported by legal intelligence and due process, not just technological efficiency.
CAclubindia
