Summary of AS 18



Crux of AS - 18:

1. The objective of the accounting standard is greater transparency and disclosures with regard to related party relationship by the reporting entity.

2. Related Party relationships arise on either of the two below:

a) Under Control

b) Under Significant Influence

3. The difference between the two is that control relationship must be reported or disclosed whether or not there have been transactions during the reporting period. SI relationships are disclosed only if there have been transactions during the reporting period.

4. The definition of a control relationship is same as under AS – 21, Holding – Subsidiary Relationship (4 Points)

a) Holding more than 20% of Voting Powers

b) Controlling the composition of the governing body

c) Subsidiary of Subsidiaries

d) Group Subsidiary

5. Under SI, holding 20% or more of the voting power and KMP with their relatives.

6. The definition of relative is limited to the immediate nucleolus of a family. It includes spouse, children, brother, sister, father and mother.

7. Even if less than 20% is held SI can be inferred if the facts and circumstances so demonstrate.

List of Clarifications Issued by the ICAI:

1. Merely because of common director or common chairman, S.I. cannot be assumed.

2. Directors appointed because of professional competency may not attract S.I.

3. Any disclosure in AS -18 must not conflict with the confidentiality cost prescribed in any other law or statue i.e. ‘Law supersedes accounting standard’

4. State control enterprises are exempt under AS -18

5. Suppliers, trade unions, financers in the normal course of business and market dynamics do not created related party relationship.

6. Members of LAB (Local Advisory Boards) do not constitute related party relationship.

7. Fellow subsidiaries by the letter of AS -18 do not constitute a related party relationship. The ICAI has however encouraged report.

8. An associate of an associate is not a related party

20%                 40%

A-----------------> B -------------- > C, In given case A & C are not related to each other

9. Co-Associates are not related parties

A holding 30% in B & 40% in C , In given case B & C are not related to each other

I have shared what I learned from classes. Simple way to remember important points.

Thanks

Chirag M. Haraniya


Published by

CA Chirag Haraniya
(Chartered Accountant)

Comment   Share 6 Likes   176605 Views Category Accounts   Report

CCI Pro

Comments


Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news

CCI Articles

submit article


Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 12 March 2026
Customer Relationship Executive

TAXLET

Calicut

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Article Trainee

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details