Section 105 of ITA'25 has become more stringent so to say as against Sec 69C of ITA'61. Under Section 69C, the use of the words "may be" has been replaced with "shall be". This therefore leaves no option for Courts to interpret the same in the assesses favour incase of any ambiguity. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of CIT v. Smt. P.K. Noorjahan [1999] 237 ITR 570 (SC) in context of section 69 - Unexplained investments has held that, "3a discretion has been conferred on the ITO under section
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited Articles Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.