Section 36(1)(va) vs Section 43B: Deduction of Employees' PF/ESI After Checkmate Services



Quick Summary
The Supreme Court has clarified that employee contributions to PF/ESI fall under Section 36(1)(va) and are treated as employer income if not deposited by the due date. Section 43B only applies to the employer's own contributions. This means delayed deposits, even if made before filing tax returns, are not deductible. While a writ petition is challenging the constitutional validity of these sections, current rulings confirm that delayed employee contributions are disallowed.

The Supreme Court in Checkmate Services Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT has categorically held that employees' contribution to PF/ESI is governed by section 36(1)(va) read with section 2(24)(x) of the Act, and such contribution shall be treated as income of the employer if not deposited within the due date prescribed under the relevant Acts. Section 43B applies only to employer's contribution, and not to the employees' contribution. 

PF/ESI Deduction: Section 36(1)(va) vs 43B Explained

Thus, the law as settled by the Supreme Court is that delayed remittance of employees' contribution, even if deposited before filing of return under section 139(1), is not allowable as a deduction. ITAT after ITAT and High Court after High Courts have ruled accordingly. A chance was taken again with the argument that the issue was debatable at the time of processing and, therefore, could not be adjusted under section 143(1)(a) in the case of M/s SRC PROJECTS PVT LTD Vs THE ACIT [2025-VIL-1647-ITAT-CHE]. However, this too was held not tenable in view of the decisions of the coordinate Benches of the Tribunal, which held that such an adjustment can be made under section 143(1)(a) based on information available in the tax audit report.

 

A little ray of Hope as a writ has been filed with the Delhi HC to examine the constitutional validity of Section 2(24)(x) r.w. Section 36(1)(va). The Delhi HC has issued notice in the Writ Petition preferred by the Assessee (Aroon Aviation Services Pvt Ltd) challenging the constitutional validity of the provisions of Section 2(24)(x) read with Section 36(1)(va); Section 2(24)(x) seeks to treat the employee's contribution deducted by the employer relating to PF and ESI etc. as income of the employer and no deduction is permissible under section 36(1)(va) to the employer if such contributions are deposited with the Government after the due date prescribed under the relevant enactment dealing with such social contributions;

 

Assessee has contended that in view of the SC judgment in Checkmate Services, the employers are being exposed to mandatory disallowance even in genuine/bona fide cases even if the delay is of a single day and for reasons beyond the control of the employer; The matter is listed on April 7, 2026. Till such time… Fingers crossed!

FAQ :

Section 36(1)(va) governs the deduction of employee contributions to PF/ESI, treating them as employer income if not deposited by the due date. Section 43B, however, only applies to the employer's own contributions.

No, according to the Supreme Court's ruling in Checkmate Services, delayed remittance of employee contributions is not allowable as a deduction, even if deposited before filing the return under section 139(1).

Yes, it has been held that such adjustments can be made under section 143(1)(a) based on information available in the tax audit report, as confirmed by decisions of the Tribunal.

Yes, a writ petition has been filed with the Delhi High Court challenging the constitutional validity of Section 2(24)(x) read with Section 36(1)(va), which treats employee contributions as employer income if not deposited on time.

The argument is that employers are facing mandatory disallowance even in genuine cases with minor delays, sometimes due to reasons beyond their control, following the Supreme Court's judgment.




About the Author

DESIGNATED PARTNER

Mr. Vivek Jalan is a FCA, Qualified LL.M (Constitutional Law) and LL.B. He is the Chairman of The Fiscal Affairs and Taxation Committee of The Bengal Chamber of Commerce and Industry. He is the Convenor on Indirect Taxes of the CII- Economic Affairs and Taxation Committee (ER); He is also a visiting faculty for Indirec ... Read more


Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro

CCI Articles

submit article