The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has put forward significant proposals to improve the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Key changes include mandatory inclusion of real estate allottees in information memorandums and resolution plans, even if they haven't filed claims. The IBBI also aims to enhance transparency by requiring more detailed disclosures in information memorandums regarding receivables, development rights, and attached assets. Furthermore, new checks and balances are proposed for 'single creditor' committees of creditors, and mandatory reasoning will be required for liquidation recommendations.
The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) released a significant Discussion Paper on November 17, 2025, aimed at addressing practical gaps and strengthening the integrity of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The proposals focus on increasing transparency, protecting real
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Broadcasts
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited Articles Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
Buy CCI PRO Now
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
The main goal is to address practical gaps and strengthen the integrity of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) by increasing transparency, protecting real estate allottees, and ensuring accountability in decision-making.
The IBBI proposes to mandate the inclusion of allottees' details in the Information Memorandum and ensure Resolution Plans strictly provide for the treatment of non-filing allottees, aligning with equity for genuine homebuyers.
The IM will be required to include comprehensive details of receivables, full disclosure of Joint Development Agreements and similar rights, and specifics of assets under attachment by agencies.
If no financial institution is present and a single unregulated creditor holds over 66% voting share, the Resolution Professional must invite the five largest operational creditors to attend CoC meetings as observers.
CoCs will have to mandatorily record the reasons for recommending liquidation, especially if a viable plan offers higher value than liquidation, and submit these reasons to the Adjudicating Authority.