When Identity Becomes the Gatekeeper of GST Consequences
In the GST regime, disputes rarely arise from arithmetic. They arise from classification, characterisation, and context. Among these, a few questions are as decisive as the identity of the supplier or recipient. NDMC represents perhaps the most litigated illustration of this identity dilemma.
Whether an entity is a government, a local authority, or merely a statutory body often determines the very applicability of exemptions, reverse charge mechanisms, and compliance obligations.
The New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) has repeatedly been subjected to such threshold scrutiny. Despite discharging classical municipal functions, doubts are often raised during audits and assessments as to whether NDMC qualifies as a "municipality" or "local authority" under GST, or whether it should be treated as a distinct statutory authority outside the municipal framework.
This question is not academic. Exemptions under Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) are available only when supplies are made by or to the Government or a local authority. If NDMC fails this identity test, the exemption analysis collapses at inception. If it passes, the enquiry correctly shifts to the nature of the supply.
Accordingly, this article undertakes a comprehensive, layered and deliberate examination of NDMC's status under GST, grounded in constitutional provisions, statutory enactments, the CGST Act (including the Explanation inserted w.e.f. 01.10.2025), authoritative Supreme Court jurisprudence, and a careful entry-wise analysis of Notification No. 12/2017- CT (Rate), supported by illustrations, FAQs, and a departmental-objective versus taxpayer-defence framework.
Constitutional Framework - What Constitutes a Municipality in Law
The concept of a municipality in India is constitutionally entrenched. Through the Seventy-Fourth Constitutional Amendment, municipalities were elevated from administrative conveniences to institutions of urban self-government.
Article 243Q mandates the constitution of municipalities in urban areas. Article 243P(e) defines a municipality as "an institution of self-government constituted under Article 243Q." Crucially, the Constitution does not insist on rigid nomenclature. It focuses on substance - governance, civic responsibility, and democratic accountability.
Article 243W empowers municipalities to perform the functions listed in the Twelfth Schedule, including urban planning, land-use regulation, roads, water supply, sanitation, public health, street lighting, and civic infrastructure. These functions define the very character of a municipality.
NDMC Act, 1994 - Statutory Manifestation of Municipal Governance
The New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994, enacted by Parliament, establishes NDMC as the principal civic authority for New Delhi. The Act creates a municipal government, not a development authority or regulatory board.
NDMC is entrusted with municipal administration, civic services, public health, infrastructure, and — critically — the power to levy and collect municipal taxes, including property tax. The Act also provides for a municipal fund, into which municipal receipts are credited and from which municipal expenditure is incurred.
Historically and legally, the power to levy municipal taxes and manage a municipal fund is the hallmark of a municipality. NDMC satisfies this test in full.
The Meaning of "Local Authority" under the CGST Act, 2017
Section 2(69) of the CGST Act defines "local authority" to include a municipality as defined in Article 243P(e) of the Constitution, and any authority legally entrusted by the Central Government or any State Government with the control or management of a municipal fund or local fund.
The definition is inclusive and purposive. It focuses on function and fiscal control, not labels. NDMC independently satisfies each limb of this definition and therefore qualifies as a local authority under GST. Moreover, since a municipality is expressly included within the statutory definition of ‘local authority' under Section 2(69) of the CGST Act, 2017, the enquiry into NDMC's municipal character simultaneously resolves its status as a local authority for GST purposes.
Definitions of "Municipal Fund" and "Local Fund" inserted with effect from 01.10.2025
To eliminate interpretational disputes, the following explanation has been inserted:
Explanation (a) to Section 2(69)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017
Explanation. For the purposes of this sub-clause—
"Local fund" means any fund under the control or management of an authority of a local self- government established for discharging civic functions in relation to a Panchayat area and vested by law with the powers to levy, collect and appropriate any tax, duty, toll, cess or fee, by whatever name called.
Explanation (b) to Section 2(69)(c) of the CGST Act, 2017
For the purposes of this sub-clause—
(b) "Municipal fund" means any fund under the control or management of an authority of a local self- government established for discharging civic functions in relation to a Metropolitan area or Municipal area and vested by law with the powers to levy, collect and appropriate any tax, duty, toll, cess or fee, by whatever name called.
This Explanation decisively shifts focus to fiscal reality — administration of a statutorily created fund.
Application of the Explanation to NDMC
NDMC administers a municipal fund constituted under the NDMC Act. Property tax, licence fees, user charges, and other municipal receipts flow into this fund, and expenditures are incurred exclusively for municipal purposes. Hence, post-01.10.2025, any residual doubt regarding NDMC's status stands legislatively extinguished.
Supreme Court Judgment - Judicial Recognition Beyond Debate
Judicial authority conclusively reinforces this position. In New Delhi Municipal Council & Ors. v. Association of Concerned Citizens of New Delhi & Ors., Civil Appeal Nos. 903- 930 of 2019, decided on 22 January 2019, the Supreme Court examined NDMC's statutory powers in detail.
The Court observed:
"Section 60 of the NDMC Act vests the power to levy taxes, including property tax, in the New Delhi Municipal Council. Under the NDMC Act, NDMC is empowered to determine the rateable value of lands and buildings and levy property tax thereon."
The power to levy property tax has historically defined municipal authority. The Court further held that NDMC's bye-laws must operate strictly within the municipal statute, reinforcing that NDMC functions as a municipal government subject to legislative discipline, not as a commercial or autonomous entity.
Once the Supreme Court has recognised NDMC as a statutory municipal authority, any attempt to deny NDMC the status of a municipality or local authority under GST becomes legally untenable. This judicial recognition is not incidental; it goes to the root of NDMC's legal character.
Relevance of Judicial Recognition for GST Interpretation
GST law must be interpreted harmoniously with constitutional principles and binding judicial precedent. The Supreme Court's recognition of NDMC's municipal character conclusively settles the identity test under Section 2(69). Accordingly, NDMC crosses the threshold under GST. What remains is the entry-wise application of the Services Exemption Notification No. 12/2017- CT (Rate) (28.06.2017).
Illustrative Applications - How NDMC's Municipal Status Operates in Real Transactions
The practical relevance of NDMC's classification as a municipality and local authority becomes most evident when examining real-life transactions rather than abstract definitions. GST law, particularly Notification No. 12/2017- CT (Rate), does not operate on institutional labels alone; it operates on the intersection of identity and activity. NDMC's municipal status provides the necessary foundation, but it is the nature, purpose, and statutory linkage of each supply that ultimately determines taxability.
For instance, consider NDMC's solid waste management services first. Activities such as door-to-door garbage collection, waste transportation, processing, and disposal are not optional or incidental functions. They are core municipal responsibilities explicitly recognised under the Twelfth Schedule to the Constitution and entrusted to municipalities under Article 243W. When NDMC engages private contractors to perform these services and supplies them as pure services, the exemption under Entry 6 of Notification No. 12/2017 squarely applies. The exemption flows not merely because NDMC is a government-linked body, but because the service is intrinsically and inseparably connected with a constitutional municipal function.
Now contrast this with a situation where NDMC leases out shops, kiosks, or office spaces located within municipal markets or commercial complexes. Although NDMC remains a local authority, the activity here is commercial renting of immovable property. Entry 7 of Notification No. 12/2017 specifically excludes renting of immovable property from the scope of exemption when provided to business entities in such cases, GST becomes payable. Importantly, this taxability does not arise because NDMC's municipal status is diluted or lost; rather, it arises because the legislature has consciously decided that commercial exploitation of assets should be subject to GST, even when undertaken by a municipal body.
A further illustration may be drawn from urban planning and infrastructure consultancy services. When NDMC appoints consultants to prepare master plans, road development strategies, drainage improvement projects, or traffic management systems, these services are directly linked to urban planning and infrastructure development — functions entrusted to municipalities under Article 243W. Provided these services qualify as pure services, an exemption under Entry 3 may be available. However, if the consultancy extends to commercial real estate development, mall planning, or revenue optimisation of municipal assets, the nexus with municipal functions weakens, and exemption may not survive.
These illustrations demonstrate a critical and often misunderstood legal principle:
NDMC's status as a municipality opens the door to exemption analysis; it does not automatically confer exemption. The decisive factor remains the character of the service and its linkage with constitutional or statutory municipal functions.
Departmental Objective vs Taxpayer Defence
From the perspective of the tax administration, the primary objective is to protect revenue and prevent misuse of exemptions. Officers are understandably cautious when exemptions are claimed for supplies involving large municipal bodies such as NDMC, particularly where the underlying activity appears commercial or revenue-generating. In pursuit of this objective, departmental arguments sometimes attempt to narrow the definition of "local authority" or to treat NDMC as a sui generis statutory authority distinct from municipalities.
However, such an approach overlooks the clear statutory and judicial framework. The CGST Act, through Section 2(69), adopts a constitutional definition of local authority. The Explanation inserted w.e.f. 01.10.2025 further reinforces this by focusing on the administration of a municipal or local fund. NDMC satisfies these tests conclusively. Once identity is settled, it cannot be reopened indirectly by questioning exemption eligibility.
From the taxpayer's perspective — whether NDMC itself or suppliers dealing with NDMC — the defence rests on a structured legal argument. First, NDMC's status as a municipality and local authority is established through constitutional provisions, the NDMC Act, Supreme Court authority, and the amended definition under the GST law. Second, exemption claims are not made on a blanket basis, but are entry-specific and activity-specific, aligned with Notification No. 12/2017-C.T.(Rate) (28.06.2017) [As amended]. Third, where activities are commercial in nature, taxpayers accept taxability; where activities are municipal in nature, exemption is claimed as a matter of right, not concession. Thus, the correct legal balance is not to deny NDMC's status or to presume misuse, but to apply the notification with precision and discipline, respecting both legislative intent and constitutional design.
NDMC vis-à-vis Delhi Development Authority (DDA) - Why the Comparison Matters
The distinction between the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) and the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) further reinforces NDMC's status as a municipality and local authority under GST. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs has, vide Circular No. 245/02/2025-GST (28.01.2025), expressly clarified that DDA does not qualify as a "local authority" for GST purposes. This clarification is rooted in the statutory character of DDA as a development authority constituted primarily for land acquisition, development, and disposal, rather than as an institution of local self-government. DDA neither functions as a municipality under Article 243Q nor discharges civic functions entrusted under Article 243W of the Constitution. Crucially, DDA does not administer a municipal or local fund in the constitutional sense, nor does it levy municipal taxes such as property tax for civic governance.
NDMC, on the other hand, stands on an entirely different constitutional and statutory footing. It is a municipal body constituted under a parliamentary enactment to govern a defined urban area, performs core civic and municipal functions listed in the Twelfth Schedule, levies municipal taxes, and administers a municipal fund exclusively for municipal purposes. The CBIC's clarification regarding DDA, therefore, does not weaken NDMC's position; rather, it sharply highlights the legal boundary between a development authority and a municipality. Treating NDMC on par with DDA would amount to collapsing a constitutionally recognised municipal institution into a non-municipal development authority—an approach inconsistent with the Constitution, the CGST Act, and binding judicial principles.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS)
FAQ 1: Does NDMC qualify as a "Municipality" and consequently as a "local authority" under GST?
Reply 1: NDMC qualifies as a municipality and, consequently, as a "local authority" under GST. Its status does not arise merely from nomenclature but from constitutional, statutory, and functional characteristics. NDMC is constituted under the NDMC Act, 1994, to govern the New Delhi area, performs functions entrusted to municipalities under Article 243W of the Constitution, levies municipal taxes, and administers a municipal fund. Section 2(69) of the CGST Act expressly includes municipalities and authorities entrusted with the control or management of a municipal or local fund. Therefore, NDMC is far more than a generic statutory authority; it is a municipal body in the constitutional sense.
FAQ 2: Is it necessary for NDMC to be expressly named in the CGST Act or Notification No. 12/2017- CT (Rate) to qualify as a local authority?
Reply 2: No. GST law does not operate on express naming but on definition-based inclusion. Section 2(69) of the CGST Act is a self-operating definition clause. Once an entity satisfies the statutory definition of a local authority, express mention becomes unnecessary. Requiring express naming would defeat the purpose of adopting a constitutional and functional definition. NDMC satisfies the definition independently; therefore, the absence of express reference does not affect its status.
FAQ 3: Does the Explanation inserted in Section 2(69) w.e.f. 01.10.2025 change the legal position for NDMC?
Reply 3: No. The Explanation does not change the legal position; it clarifies and reinforces it. NDMC always administered a municipal fund under the NDMC Act, 1994. The Explanation merely codifies the fiscal test by defining "municipal fund" and "local fund". For NDMC, this amendment acts as a statutory seal, eliminating any residual interpretational doubt and strengthening its position in audits post-01.10.2025.
FAQ 4: Can NDMC be denied exemption merely because it earns revenue or undertakes revenue-generating activities?
Reply 4: No. Revenue generation has never been inconsistent with municipal character. Municipal bodies historically levy property taxes, licence fees, user charges, and rentals. Under GST, what matters is not whether revenue is earned, but the nature of the activity. Commercial activities undertaken by NDMC may be taxable, but such taxability does not dilute NDMC's status as a municipality or local authority.
FAQ 5: If NDMC rents out commercial property, does it lose its status as a local authority for that transaction?
Reply 5: No. NDMC does not lose its status; only the exemption is lost. Renting of immovable property for commercial use is specifically excluded from exemption under Entry 7 of Services Exemption Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) (28.06.2017) [As amended from time to time]. GST becomes payable because the legislature has chosen to tax such activity, not because NDMC ceases to be a municipality. Status remains constant; taxability varies with each activity.
FAQ 6: Are all services provided to NDMC automatically exempt under Entry 6 of Services Exemption Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate)?
Reply 6: No. Entry 6 is conditional, not automatic. The service must be:
- a pure service (or qualifying composite supply); and
- provided in relation to functions entrusted to municipalities under Article 243W.
If either of the above two conditions is not satisfied — for example, if the service is unrelated to municipal functions or involves substantial supply of goods — the exemption will not apply, even though NDMC is a local authority.
FAQ 7: Can the department argue that NDMC is different from other municipal corporations and therefore not entitled to the same treatment?
Reply 7: No. Such an argument is legally unsustainable. Administrative differences in structure or jurisdiction do not affect municipal character. Constitutionally and statutorily, NDMC performs the same class of functions as other municipalities. The Supreme Court has recognised NDMC as a municipal authority exercising municipal taxation powers. The GST law does not create sub-classes of municipalities for differential treatment unless expressly provided.
FAQ 8: Does the Supreme Court judgment on NDMC, delivered in the context of property tax, apply to GST matters?
Reply 8: Yes, to the extent it determines the character and statutory nature of NDMC. While the tax statute involved may differ, judicial findings on whether an authority is a municipal body exercising municipal taxation powers are trans-statutory in relevance, unless expressly excluded. The GST law itself adopts constitutional definitions, making such judgments directly relevant.
FAQ 9: How should borderline cases be analysed where the service has both municipal and commercial elements?
Reply 9: Borderline cases require dominant purpose and statutory linkage analysis. The enquiry should focus on whether the service is predominantly connected with a municipal function under Article 243W or whether it primarily serves commercial objectives. Where municipal linkage is dominant and statutory, exemption may apply; where commercial intent dominates, taxability follows. Hence, blanket assumptions either way are legally incorrect.
FAQ 10: What is the correct approach for audits and assessments involving NDMC post-01.10.2025?
Reply 10: The correct approach is a two-stage discipline.
First, accept NDMC's status as a municipality and local authority — this issue stands conclusively settled by statute, Explanation, and judicial authority.
Second, examine each supply independently under Services Exemption Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax(/Rate) (28.06.2017) ([As amended) applying entry conditions, exclusions, and factual linkage with municipal functions. Reopening the identity question at the exemption stage is legally flawed and procedurally improper.
FAQ 11: Can suppliers to NDMC rely on the exemption even if NDMC is not registered under GST for that activity?
Reply 11: Yes, where the exemption entry is recipient-centric (such as Entry 6), the GST registration status of NDMC is not determinative. What matters is the nature of service, the recipient's status as a local authority, and the statutory linkage of the function. However, documentation and contractual clarity become critical.
FAQ 12: What principle should guide GST treatment of NDMC?
Reply 12: NDMC's identity as a municipality is settled; GST consequences flow solely from the character of the transaction, not from doubts about its status.
Concluding Views— Identity Settled, Application Demands Maturity and Precision
The question whether the New Delhi Municipal Council qualifies as a municipality or local authority under GST admits of only one legally sustainable answer. NDMC's status is constitutionally rooted, statutorily enacted, judicially affirmed, and now legislatively reinforced through the Explanation to Section 2(69) inserted with effect from 01.10.2025.
The Constitution envisages municipalities as institutions of urban self-government. The NDMC Act gives concrete statutory form to that vision in the context of New Delhi. The Supreme Court has recognised NDMC's municipal character and its power to levy municipal taxes. The CGST Act incorporates such bodies within the definition of local authority. The 2025 Explanation removes any residual ambiguity by focusing on the administration of a municipal fund.
Against this backdrop, attempts to question NDMC's identity under GST are not merely misplaced; they are legally untenable. At the same time, the GST law does not grant municipalities blanket immunity. It consciously adopts an activity-based approach. Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) exempts services that are municipal, sovereign, or citizen-oriented, while taxing those that are commercial or revenue-driven. This balance reflects legislative wisdom rather than concession.
Therefore, the correct approach under GST is a two-stage discipline. The first stage — identity — stands conclusively settled in favour of NDMC being a municipality and local authority. The second stage — taxability — requires careful, entry-wise, service-wise analysis, grounded in constitutional functions and statutory intent. In essence, GST does not question NDMC's character; it scrutinises the character of each transaction. That is where the law ends — and where mature application must begin. GST, in its design, does not distrust municipalities; it merely demands discipline in distinguishing governance from commerce — and NDMC stands as a textbook illustration of that balance.
CAclubindia
