ca=10
cs=9
cwa=7
cfa=9
cpa=8
mba=6
Mahika
(CA-FINALIST)
(64 Points)
Replied 25 September 2009
Krunal Raichura
(Financial Advisory)
(2134 Points)
Replied 25 September 2009
Originally posted by :Mahika | ||
" | Dear friends,v can comment on d +ve aspect of this forum instead of cursing the comparison b/n diff courses.V can comment on dual degree aspect tht may guide sm1. So, do post cmments on tht,plz.I thnk CA+MBA(from gud instt.) Makes perfect combination. |
" |
The question is not about positive or negative aspect of courses. See, everything in this world has two aspects to it., there is nothing which is only good or only bad.
Actually, the post by itself is incomplete at the first place because it never mentioned what are we rating courses for, is it for a business or job, if its for a job, is for a job of a peon, clerk, ordinary data entry accountant, or a high profile job or marketing/hr/product development job...etc??? without knowing any facts, you will see that many people have rated CA course the highest and some have even mentioned that CAs are in high demand, whereas the fact (again repeating, not my opinion) which is mentioned in the aforesaid link suggests something else.
You can see your post itself, you said CA+MBA is a good combination. I am not saying you are wrong or right, in one way you can be viewed wrong and in one way you can be viewed right as well.
A person who is interested in practising as a company secretary or a cost accountant will not find this answer right.
And its not that those guys dont make money. You can pick up the annual report of all NSE 50 companies. In that report you will find the senior management's background and remuneration paid to them. I can bet on this, in 80% cases, the highest paid executives come from non-finance background. In remaining 20% people come from finance background and a few of them are CAs. This is because of the very obvious reason that accounting, auditing and taxation and legal departments are compliance departments. They are cost centres and dont generate any revenue as such. Whereas Marketing, HR, Product Development, Strategy & Operations etc are revenue generating departments and there is no doubt that executives out there would always be the highest paid people.
There is nothing unbeatable or perfect. CA+MBA etc etc etc...and all probabilities can be imperfect and very easily beatable. This can be seen from the fortune 500 list of richest people. In the first few positions, you will find ordinary graduates, dropouts and people who have never attended schools. I would urge everyone to post here the names of people with unbeatable cominations in that list if there are any, or rather if you feel there are any.
Mahika
(CA-FINALIST)
(64 Points)
Replied 27 September 2009
The question is not about positive or negative aspect of courses. See, everything in this world has two aspects to it., there is nothing which is only good or only bad.
Actually, the post by itself is incomplete at the first place because it never mentioned what are we rating courses for, is it for a business or job, if its for a job, is for a job of a peon, clerk, ordinary data entry accountant, or a high profile job or marketing/hr/product development job...etc??? without knowing any facts, you will see that many people have rated CA course the highest and some have even mentioned that CAs are in high demand, whereas the fact (again repeating, not my opinion) which is mentioned in the aforesaid link suggests something else. You can see your post itself, you said CA+MBA is a good combination. I am not saying you are wrong or right, in one way you can be viewed wrong and in one way you can be viewed right as well. A person who is interested in practising as a company secretary or a cost accountant will not find this answer right. And its not that those guys dont make money. You can pick up the annual report of all NSE 50 companies. In that report you will find the senior management's background and remuneration paid to them. I can bet on this, in 80% cases, the highest paid executives come from non-finance background. In remaining 20% people come from finance background and a few of them are CAs. This is because of the very obvious reason that accounting, auditing and taxation and legal departments are compliance departments. They are cost centres and dont generate any revenue as such. Whereas Marketing, HR, Product Development, Strategy & Operations etc are revenue generating departments and there is no doubt that executives out there would always be the highest paid people. There is nothing unbeatable or perfect. CA+MBA etc etc etc...and all probabilities can be imperfect and very easily beatable. This can be seen from the fortune 500 list of richest people. In the first few positions, you will find ordinary graduates, dropouts and people who have never attended schools. I would urge everyone to post here the names of people with unbeatable cominations in that list if there are any, or rather if you feel there are any. ok sir u r rite .........
santhosh
(Student)
(1174 Points)
Replied 01 October 2009
i am also agree with Love arora and Harsh*t......
Live Course on EPF & ESI Act - Mastercourse(With Govt Certificate)