result analyisis

ITS GOOD NOT TOO BAD

trend can't be calculated

@ Samrat : U think its good?? I mean, 7.86% is good>>??? Please, just for me, please justify the same....

Dhiraj, I think the institute have to maintain the quality of CAs.

And simultaneously economic condition also have to be measure. We are still reviving from global slowdown. we do not want that there are more supply of CAs then the demand.

Regards

Piyush

Piyush, agreed with you, that standards have to be maintainded and as well as the demand-supply factor is to be considered..

But still, i think, in practicing of maintaining all this SO CALLED HIGH STANDARDS, institute is playing biased. Please, dont get me wrong, being a student of the same institute, i'm not against it.. But in November, in my town no student cleared the FINALS... Yes, it was 0% result..

I'm from Vadodara, and the city has produced rankers,. But the NOVEMBER results broke all the expectations and dreams of many. Does ICAI wants to convey that from the last novemeber batch, none studied or worked hard?? Then how is it possible to that none cleared??

The results are alwz biased, just to maintain the standards, they themselves are loosing the real potential students... And its ridiculous.

Regards,

| DHIRAJ RAMCHANDANI |

(humour)

We can say that Institute's performance is "poor" while declaring results !

           7.86% IS TOO LOW........ AS COMPARED TO EARLIER RESULTS.....