CA in Practice
1028 Points
Posted on 17 September 2026
On the exception clause (tax paid over Rs 1 lakh in each of the last two FYs), the key point both queries are missing is whose PAN the tax payment has to be under.
1) Partnership case: the "registered person" for GST purposes is the firm itself (its own PAN/GSTIN). Income tax of Rs 1 lakh+ paid personally by one partner, under the partner's individual PAN, does not satisfy the exception - it has to be tax paid under the firm's own PAN. If the firm itself hasn't paid income tax of that magnitude, Rule 86B applies and 1% of output tax liability has to be discharged in cash, unless another exception applies (refund of unutilised ITC exceeding Rs 1 lakh, government body/PSU status, TDS/TCS deposited over Rs 1 lakh in the current FY, etc).
2) Proprietorship case: here the proprietor's PAN and the firm's PAN are the same, so the proprietor's personal income tax payment does count. Since he hasn't paid Rs 1 lakh+ in each of the last two FYs, this exception isn't available, so Rule 86B applies here too - subject to checking the other exceptions before finalising the 1% cash payment requirement.
Worth going through the full exception list clause-by-clause for both clients rather than relying on the income-tax-paid test alone.