58 Points
Posted on 15 November 2018
Answer to question 1 is similar to following case law as per earlier service tax
Question . A society, running renowned schools, allows other schools to use a specific name, its logo and motto and receives a non-refundable amount and annual fee as a consideration. Whether this amounts to a taxable service?
Solution: Mayo College General Council v. CCEx. (Appeals) 2012 (28) STR 225 (Raj) The High Court held that when the petitioner permitted other schools to use their name, logo as also motto, it clearly tantamounted to providing ‘franchise service’ to the said schools and if the petitioner realized the ‘franchise’ or ‘collaboration fees’ from the franchise schools, the petitioner was duty bound to pay service tax to the department.