| Originally posted by : Mohd Atir Siddique | ||
![]() |
Around 25 questions from last two rtps,but both amalgamation and holding were out of league. |
![]() |
| Originally posted by : Mohd Atir Siddique | ||
![]() |
Around 25 questions from last two rtps,but both amalgamation and holding were out of league. |
![]() |
Paper was easy as compared to previous two attempts, however there will be more chance of tight checking. Most of the questions were repeated.
Best of luck for the next exam.
I got 59 in last attempt and didnt find it easy compared to previous attempt. Found it at same level.
Even i heard ma frnds saying..paper ws easier than last attempt..
I dont think that paper is so easy as there is no economic value added n value added which are d scoring part 4 accounts
ques 2 - holding co.. it is the only question of LOSS making Subsy..
it is a Different question than all other 60-70 questions found in d book..
if any one has done HOLDING.. than try this U will Actually KNOW the Difference..
MARK THIS Question this is A EXCEPTIONAL And among A very very few Question on LOSS making Co..
deserved more than 16 marks.. becoz a very lengthy and a difficult question
paper was easy but.. IF only u HAVE prepared for
1. NBFC - 10 marks
2. MUTUAL FUNDS - 5 marks
3. HRA - 5 marks
4. AS-25 5 marks
This makes the no . of marks 25
and normally these chapters are given low priority..
we focus on
1. Eva - 0 marks
2. VALUE added- 0 marks
3. AS-20 - 0 marks
4. AS- 28 - 0 marks
5. Esop - 0 marks
these 5 are very imp chapters in each attempt and normally 20-30 marks on the minimum side are covered frm these chapters.. but this time 0 marks
if u have prepared..than the paper was easy.. otherwise.. the paper was Frm different world
the GUYZ who have givven the paper will know this..
we are just commenting on it
the things whch luks easy now if that comes in our Attempt.. than The COMMENTS just GET REVERSED..
| Originally posted by : VIVEK | ||
![]() |
I dont think that paper is so easy as there is no economic value added n value added which are d scoring part 4 accounts |
![]() |
Im eagerly waiting to see the today's question paper...
thank you so much for quick upload....
very good paper.... I hope students done well... ![]()
my frnds attempted paper well... lets hope result also be good ... ![]()
Paper was not very easy as has been said by many but it was managable to score passing marks for one
who prepared nicely and was like previos papers not easy not hard !![]()
Well i think d paper is easy, i mean one can easily get 60% if u study seriously.
| Originally posted by : Member of CCI | ||
![]() |
I think there seems some error in asking Question on Revised Schedule - VI in case of Consolidation sum (Q - 2) In old schedule - VI , the answer is calculated as under :- 1. Draft illustrative balance sheet as on 31/03/2012 (i.e. after 2 years) incorporating adjustments. 2. But here balances of Debtors, creditors, Stock and cash-bank balance not given. So, find difference in BS , treat it as net working capital 3. Now all other steps are ordinary & prepare Consolidated Balance sheet The query is "There is no concept such as Net working Capital in Revised Schedule - VI " then how consolidated balance sheet is to be prepared. |
![]() |
Hey bro I Did the same qustion earlier, It is a repetative qustion, alredy asked in November, 1999...U can refer this suggested answer.. Institute Assume that the Value of Debtors and Stock is remail same after 2 year...:P... I think its pourly wrong assumption....:(..But as it is done by ICAI.. We have to Respet the Answer..:P
Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies
Click here to Login / Register
Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants
New Delhi
CA Final
View DetailsIndia's largest network for
finance professionals