Demand of duty with respect to period of limitation

As provided under s. 11a(1), a central excise officer can, within one year from relevant date, serve show cause notice on person chargeable to duty if- (a) duty of excise has not been levied or paid or (b) short levied or shortpaid or (c) erroneously refunded.

In cases of fraud, collusion, willful misstatement and suppression of facts or contravention  of any provision of of central excise act or rules with intent to evade payment of duty, the period of limitation is five years to issue SCN.

Now, the question arises that if audit takes place after the limitation period of one year from  relevant date, if cases of duties short levied or paid are detected during audit, where there is no malafide intention can there be SCN after the audit even though the limitation period is over?. I repeat that here we are talking about only those cases where there are genuine mistakes and misunderstanding and no malafide intention.

Pl. clarify the matter citing legal references.

Replies (2)
Originally posted by : Amit

As provided under s. 11a(1), a central excise officer can, within one year from relevant date, serve show cause notice on person chargeable to duty if- (a) duty of excise has not been levied or paid or (b) short levied or shortpaid or (c) erroneously refunded.

In cases of fraud, collusion, willful misstatement and suppression of facts or contravention  of any provision of of central excise act or rules with intent to evade payment of duty, the period of limitation is five years to issue SCN.

Now, the question arises that if audit takes place after the limitation period of one year from  relevant date, if cases of duties short levied or paid are detected during audit, where there is no malafide intention can there be SCN after the audit even though the limitation period is over?. I repeat that here we are talking about only those cases where there are genuine mistakes and misunderstanding and no malafide intention.

Pl. clarify the matter citing legal references.

during the audit if it is traced that duties are short levied and paid, then whether assessee recognized his fault and paid the shortage of duty with interest upfront at his own ?

if yes, then SCN is just a formality and assessee will not be convicted with evasion charges, and mere reply to SCN with clear intention that shortage of duty is paid upfront on advise of audit team and before issue of SCN.

if no , then what for the assessee was waiting for ? it counter supports the malafide intention of assessee to pay short of duty and department will establish that its practice of assesee to evade the taxes under shelter of misc notifications wrongly availed. 

Thanks you sharmasir.

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
14 October 2026
Accountant

Rize.farm

Bengaluru

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 17 October 2026
Articled Assistant

RRPM & Associates LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 October 2026
Article assistant

S.K.Bajpai & Co.

Noida

B.Com

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountant

Jari Saree Center

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
08 October 2026
SALES TELECALLER

HIRE NOVA

Lucknow

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
12 October 2026
Finance

I-Genext Consulting Private Limited

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
26 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

pushpganga ventures

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountants/Articles (Freshers/Experienced)

ADY & CO.

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details