Query of induatrial dispute act 1947?
This query is : Resolved
18 May 2011
Please explain?
Certain employees working with Engineering factory to
which Factories Act, 1948 applied.
The employees were paid for by cash without any signature and no
appointment letter of their engagement.
They did not sign any attendence register.
In other words
there were no records about their employment and for receiving
their salaries.
The services of these employees were terminated.
Can these employees successfully claim for re-instatement
under the industrial Disputes Act, 1947?
Certain employees working with Engineering factory to
which Factories Act, 1948 applied.
The employees were paid for by cash without any signature and no
appointment letter of their engagement.
They did not sign any attendence register.
In other words
there were no records about their employment and for receiving
their salaries.
The services of these employees were terminated.
Can these employees successfully claim for re-instatement
under the industrial Disputes Act, 1947?
18 May 2011
if the employee is able to establish that he was employed and paid in previous period(s) for his services rendered, by way of any witness/ record/ evidence issued by owner, then he is eligible to claim.
10 August 2024
### **Understanding the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947**
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act) provides a legal framework for the resolution of disputes between employers and employees in industrial establishments. It addresses issues such as employment conditions, disputes over termination, and reinstatement.
### **Context of the Query**
In your scenario, employees working in an engineering factory (to which the Factories Act, 1948 applies) were:
- Paid in cash without signatures or appointment letters.
- Did not sign any attendance register.
- Had no records of their employment.
Their services have been terminated, and you are asking whether these employees can claim reinstatement under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
### **Key Points Under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947**
1. **Definition of Employee:**
- **Section 2(s):** Defines "workman" as any person employed in an industry who is not a manager, supervisor, or other categories excluded by the Act.
2. **Termination of Services:**
- **Section 2(oo):** Defines "retrenchment" as termination of service by the employer, including cases where the employee's service is terminated on the ground of redundancy.
- **Section 25F:** Provides that an employee must be given one month’s notice or pay in lieu of notice, and compensation should be paid in cases of retrenchment.
3. **Right to Reinstatement:**
- **Section 11A:** Empowers the Labor Court or Tribunal to consider whether the termination was justified or not. If it finds the termination unjustified, it can order reinstatement with or without back wages.
4. **Record-Keeping and Formalities:**
- Lack of appointment letters, attendance registers, or employment records does not negate the fact that the individuals were employees. The absence of these records might make proving employment difficult, but it does not automatically disqualify the employees from claiming their rights under the ID Act.
### **Answering the Query**
**1. **Eligibility for Reinstatement:**
- Employees can indeed claim reinstatement under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, despite the lack of formal records, if they can prove that they were employees and their termination was unjust or in violation of legal provisions.
**2. **Sections to Refer:**
- **Section 2(s):** To establish their status as "workmen."
- **Section 2(oo):** For understanding the nature of termination.
- **Section 25F:** For requirements related to retrenchment, including notice and compensation.
- **Section 11A:** For claims related to the justification of dismissal and potential reinstatement.
### **Draft Answer for an Exam**
In the context of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, employees working at an engineering factory, who were paid in cash without formal records or appointment letters, can still claim reinstatement despite these shortcomings. The ID Act provides protections for workers in such scenarios.
1. **Legal Standing of Employees:**
- **Section 2(s)** of the ID Act defines "workman" as a person employed in an industry, which includes the employees in question.
2. **Termination and Rights:**
- Under **Section 2(oo)**, if the termination was akin to retrenchment, then **Section 25F** mandates that the employee should have received proper notice or pay in lieu thereof and retrenchment compensation.
3. **Claims for Reinstatement:**
- **Section 11A** empowers the Labor Court or Tribunal to examine if the termination was justified. If found unjustified, the court can order reinstatement and potentially grant back wages.
**Conclusion:**
Despite the lack of formal records, employees have the right to challenge their termination under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. They can claim reinstatement by proving their status as workmen and showing that the termination was in violation of statutory provisions. The absence of formal records may impact the ease of proving their claims but does not inherently invalidate their rights.
### **Summary of Actions:**
1. **Gather Evidence:**
- Employees should collect any available evidence to prove their employment status.
2. **File a Dispute:**
- They should file a dispute with the appropriate Labor Court or Tribunal under Section 10 of the ID Act, citing Sections 11A, 25F, and relevant provisions.
3. **Seek Legal Assistance:**
- Consulting with a labor lawyer for advice and representation can help in navigating the complexities of such cases.
The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act) provides a legal framework for the resolution of disputes between employers and employees in industrial establishments. It addresses issues such as employment conditions, disputes over termination, and reinstatement.
### **Context of the Query**
In your scenario, employees working in an engineering factory (to which the Factories Act, 1948 applies) were:
- Paid in cash without signatures or appointment letters.
- Did not sign any attendance register.
- Had no records of their employment.
Their services have been terminated, and you are asking whether these employees can claim reinstatement under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
### **Key Points Under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947**
1. **Definition of Employee:**
- **Section 2(s):** Defines "workman" as any person employed in an industry who is not a manager, supervisor, or other categories excluded by the Act.
2. **Termination of Services:**
- **Section 2(oo):** Defines "retrenchment" as termination of service by the employer, including cases where the employee's service is terminated on the ground of redundancy.
- **Section 25F:** Provides that an employee must be given one month’s notice or pay in lieu of notice, and compensation should be paid in cases of retrenchment.
3. **Right to Reinstatement:**
- **Section 11A:** Empowers the Labor Court or Tribunal to consider whether the termination was justified or not. If it finds the termination unjustified, it can order reinstatement with or without back wages.
4. **Record-Keeping and Formalities:**
- Lack of appointment letters, attendance registers, or employment records does not negate the fact that the individuals were employees. The absence of these records might make proving employment difficult, but it does not automatically disqualify the employees from claiming their rights under the ID Act.
### **Answering the Query**
**1. **Eligibility for Reinstatement:**
- Employees can indeed claim reinstatement under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, despite the lack of formal records, if they can prove that they were employees and their termination was unjust or in violation of legal provisions.
**2. **Sections to Refer:**
- **Section 2(s):** To establish their status as "workmen."
- **Section 2(oo):** For understanding the nature of termination.
- **Section 25F:** For requirements related to retrenchment, including notice and compensation.
- **Section 11A:** For claims related to the justification of dismissal and potential reinstatement.
### **Draft Answer for an Exam**
In the context of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, employees working at an engineering factory, who were paid in cash without formal records or appointment letters, can still claim reinstatement despite these shortcomings. The ID Act provides protections for workers in such scenarios.
1. **Legal Standing of Employees:**
- **Section 2(s)** of the ID Act defines "workman" as a person employed in an industry, which includes the employees in question.
2. **Termination and Rights:**
- Under **Section 2(oo)**, if the termination was akin to retrenchment, then **Section 25F** mandates that the employee should have received proper notice or pay in lieu thereof and retrenchment compensation.
3. **Claims for Reinstatement:**
- **Section 11A** empowers the Labor Court or Tribunal to examine if the termination was justified. If found unjustified, the court can order reinstatement and potentially grant back wages.
**Conclusion:**
Despite the lack of formal records, employees have the right to challenge their termination under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. They can claim reinstatement by proving their status as workmen and showing that the termination was in violation of statutory provisions. The absence of formal records may impact the ease of proving their claims but does not inherently invalidate their rights.
### **Summary of Actions:**
1. **Gather Evidence:**
- Employees should collect any available evidence to prove their employment status.
2. **File a Dispute:**
- They should file a dispute with the appropriate Labor Court or Tribunal under Section 10 of the ID Act, citing Sections 11A, 25F, and relevant provisions.
3. **Seek Legal Assistance:**
- Consulting with a labor lawyer for advice and representation can help in navigating the complexities of such cases.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Section 270A penalty
- GST- DRC 03 RCM Liability
- GSTR 1- Amend Credit Note
- Query on managerial remuneration u/s 197 of CA 2013
- Validity of form 15 G and 15 H on Interest on fixed deposit
- Threshold limit of under GST for insurance agent
- Supply to unit situated in SEZ
- Tax liability on gift amount given to blood relation
- International transfer pricing- -> father entity vs son entity ->WHERE NO mutual say in management
- Additional income for updated return
- Problem in filing Returns for International workers in EPFO
- Clarification for reversal of IGST on transfer of duty-free imported goods from EOU to DTA unit
- EXCESS CREDIT REALTED GST REVERSAL
- Export invoice not reported
- CA Articleship Extension Matter
- GST OFFICER WRONG NOTICE
- "Please ensure that the Total of the Deductions u/s 54F match the same in Table D in Sch CG"
- Composition Dealer GST Annual Return Filing process
- Revision under Section 264 in The Income Tax Act, 1961
- TDS under section 195.
Trending Online Classes
-
Live Course on GSTR 9 & 9C for FY 24-25(Detailed discussions, FAQ, Case studies and Live demo of GSTR 9/9C on GST Portal)
Industry Expert16 November 2025
CAclubindia
