The Interaction between India's current insolvency code and income tax law



Quick Summary
India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of 2016 significantly reshaped insolvency laws, prioritising secured creditors and placing government taxes lower in the pecking order for debt recovery. However, the IBC mandates that tax authorities must adhere to approved resolution plans, even concerning tax dues. The article delves into the income tax implications of IBC resolution plans, including how waived liabilities and debt write-backs are taxed, and the potential for mitigating Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT). It also discusses provisions for carrying forward losses and depreciation, even with changes in shareholding, and the tax considerations for share transfers below fair value.

After adopting the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), India overhauled the insolvency and bankruptcy law. The IBC is a landmark statute and a transformation through India's insolvency regime.

India s Insolvency Code and Income Tax: Key Interactions

The IBC insolvency settlement provides for the submission of potential creditor payments for the recovery of an unpaid debtor. These mitigation strategies include the restructuring of the distressed business debtor.  

With respect to the allocation of proceeds resulting from the business debtor's resolution, the IBC stipulates a strong priority in that the secured financial creditors are the highest-ranking and the responsibilities of other unsecured creditors and government duties are smaller. Like other policy liabilities, the tax obligations of an operating lender are also considered to be volatile and below the financial lender's dues. This was founded in a series of legal precedents.

However, the IBC stipulates that the IBC Settlement agreement shall be binding on public authorities (including taxation authorities), so once the waiver of non-secured creditors in compliance with the Resolution Plan has been accepted by the bankruptcy court it is binding on tax authorities for any tax dues as well.

Analysis

Like any trade, IBC resolution also means income tax. The IBC resolution plan could provide for the restructuring of a corporate debtor through the sale of assets, merger, demerger, acquisition of shares, waiver of the sum payable to financial and operational creditors, etc. The impact of income taxes on certain aspects are examined below: If any outstanding liability for an entity approved in a corporate debtor (i.e. corporate debtor) is waived in accordance with the approved resolution plan such waiver/write-back, especially operational creditors liability, is subject to tax in normal as well as the minimum alternate form.

MAT liability could be mitigated by electing a new concessional 25.12% corporate tax regime or by compensating for future losses. Nevertheless, there are no clear provisions for the regular taxation of corporations under the IBC. Where a past deduction has been permitted in respect of any operating debt, the withdrawal would be taxable subject to (if any) relief due to income tax losses. With regard to financial debt write-back, enterprises must rely on certain legal precedents to claim tax exemption.

Typically, to calculate book profits for MAT levy, a company has the right to offset any incumbent business losses or non-absorbed depreciation. Therefore, when either the business losses or the unabsorbed depreciation are nil, no deduction is permitted. In order to relieve IBC undertakings, a company whose application is admitted under the IBC is entitled to set off aggregates of accrued losses and unabsorbed depreciation.

In the case of a closely held company, a repayment and redeeming of losses is permitted only where the beneficial owner of the shares with at least 51 percent voting power is continuous. In the case of an insolvency company, ownership of shares with more than 51% of voting power is expected to change, leading to the lapse of the business losses. To this end, the Indian tax law provides that, when a company's resolution plan is approved by the IBC, a company is eligible for the repayment of losses even if the shareholding changes beyond that threshold.


Indian tax laws provide for fair value tax when transferring shares of a company (with the exception of quoted shares) below the fair price (FMV) of shares calculated according to the tax rules. Similarly, the deficit between the FMV and the actual consideration is considered income and taxed at the applicable tax rate for the transferor. In the case of troubled properties and companies, securities are expected to be less than the FMV. This could lead to tax consequences for both the transferor and the consumer. The government is entitled to exempt certain classes of people under the law; however, no notices have been issued to date.

With regard to corporate debtor restructuring through merger/demerger, this should be structured to make tax neutral for the corporate debtor, its shareholders as well as the acquirer under the IBC process.
As shown above, various forms of relief under Indian tax law have been established which facilitate the settlement of insolvent companies through the IBC process.

FAQ :

Under the IBC, secured financial creditors have the highest priority for payment. Other unsecured creditors and government dues, including tax obligations, rank lower.

Yes, the IBC stipulates that resolution plans are binding on public authorities, including taxation authorities. Once a waiver of non-secured creditors' dues is approved by the bankruptcy court, it is binding on tax authorities for any tax dues.

When a liability of a corporate debtor is waived or written back as part of an approved IBC resolution plan, this waiver, particularly for operational creditors' liabilities, is generally subject to income tax.

Yes, companies admitted under the IBC are eligible to set off accumulated losses and unabsorbed depreciation. Indian tax law also provides for the repayment of losses even if shareholding changes beyond the usual 51% threshold, when a resolution plan is approved.

Indian tax laws can impose a fair value tax when shares are transferred below their fair market value. The deficit between the fair market value and the actual consideration can be taxed as income for the transferor, though exemptions may apply.


4148 Views Comment   Share LAW   Report


About the Author

CA

Some of the key areas I expert in: User Experience Design Strategy Information Architecture Interaction Design Online Consumer Experiences for web and mobile platforms New Media/ Mobile UX Build/ Lead teams in different verticals Managing ROI Competitive Analysis Creative Duties/ Leadership Project ... Read more


Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro

CCI Articles

submit article