banner_ad

Direct Tax Code There is still room for improvement



 
DIRECT TAX CODE – THERE IS STILL ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT
The Implementation of the New Direct tax code based on the Revised Discussion Paper will definitely be a CBM (Confidence Building Measure) from a layman point of view. The new tax rates resemble those prevailing in a developed economy. However there are a couple of issues worth noticing, accompanied by suggested amendments for the same
1.      The withdrawal of HRA exemption means double taxation of the income once in the hands of the salaried individual and again in the hands of the Landlord. Somebody can argue what about the other allowances which also get axed. The point is HRA in most companies is a significant 25% of Basic pay.
2.      While it is heartening that the Maximum Marginal rate for Individuals starts only from above Rs.25 lacs, the elimination of exemption on HRA in entirety might drive up the Salary levels for high end White collared Jobs in the form of Non Monetary Perks, as individuals will bargain to compensate themselves for the tax burden. As we all know that in most cases the employer bears the tax on perks. Thus both perks plus the tax add to the employer cost. The result is, India might become less favorable Investment destination for outsourcing White collared jobs.
3.      Added to this, is the removal of interest deduction for self occupied property which does not augur well for transfer of jobs/migration to new location. Right now, the employee can get the benefit of deducting both the rent and interest if he is living in a rented accommodation close to place of employment. With this move there is an otherwise double blow on salaried class.
There are two suggestions to give counter effects/rationalize,
1.      Not to remove the deduction benefit available under the current Sec.80GG (Chapter VIA), but also make it more lucrative   than the current HRA Exemption. Currently this provision is rarely used, as HRA invariably forms a component of Salary in almost all companies.
2.      Make provisions to include the Interest on Borrowed capital for Housing as part of Cost of Acquisition/Improvement for computing Capital Gains on transfer of immoveable property as applicable. Right now such interests are not measured in Cost of Improvement as they are deductible. Such inclusion will also align the tax treatment with the one as per AS-16 (Borrowing cost).
 
Hoping to see some improvements along these lines during finalisation.



Published by


IFRS Consultant

Myself a B.COM,ACA from 2005. Passed IFRS,Valuation certification (issued by ICAI) and forensic course of IFS. Engaged asIFRS Consultant for an Australian firm. . Great feeling to make friends through this channel. The feedbacks that i received formy articles is encouraging and i sincerely thank our friends fo .. Read more

CCI Pro

Comments


Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news

CCI Articles

submit article


Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details