The Meghalaya High Court in M/s Jorabat Shillong Expressway Ltd. v. Union of India (2026-VIL-674-MEG) reiterates that review jurisdiction is limited to apparent errors, new evidence, or patent illegality.
Can GST authorities deny ITC solely based on 26AS, toll plaza reports, or other third-party data? Learn why taxpayers should challenge data-driven allegations, understand the burden of proof under GST law, and adopt an effective defence strategy against weak investigations.
CESTAT Chennai in Valmet Technologies rules that while sub-letting rent is taxable, time-barred demands cannot be revived through later limitation amendments. The judgment also clarifies that electricity recoveries are not taxable services, penalties require proof of evasion, and extended limitation cannot be invoked without evidence of suppression or fraud.
Complete guide to the GST Composition Scheme for FY 2026-27 covering eligibility, turnover limits, tax rates, service provider scheme, e-commerce rules, compliance forms, due dates, ITC restrictions, and latest legal updates under Section 10 of the CGST Act.
Can a tax liability be imposed retrospectively through implication? Explore the legal principles, court rulings, and why tax laws creating new liabilities are generally presumed to operate prospectively, not retrospectively.
Learn why GST output tax cannot be demanded solely based on P&L and GSTR-3B mismatches. Explore reconciliation rules, legal principles and taxpayer remedies.
The Gujarat High Court in Kuehne Nagel Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India held that GST refund interest under Section 56 cannot be denied by treating a post-court refund application as a fresh claim. Interest must be computed from the original refund application date when the Department's earlier refusal was held illegal. Learn the key implications for taxpayers and refund litigation.
Can GST refunds be denied using a rule that no longer exists? The Gujarat High Court in Alstom Transport India Ltd. held that omitted Rules 89(4B) and 96(10) cannot govern pending refund disputes in the absence of a saving clause, providing significant relief to exporters.
GSTAT Delhi's Dow Chemical ruling clarifies that own-account procurement services by a group entity are not intermediary services under GST. Learn the key principles on import of services, reverse charge liability, refund claims, and cross-border GST classification.
Can GST authorities invoke Section 74 based on suspicion alone? The Madras High Court in M/s Fastenex Pvt. Ltd. v. State Tax Officer clarifies that fraud, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts must be supported by traceable material, while reaffirming the importance of reasoned notices, natural justice, and taxpayer responses under the GST framework.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English