Adani Power Limited has been penalised by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) for failing to comply with Sections 188 and 189 of the Companies Act 2013. The company entered into related party transactions during the financial years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20 but did not record these in the contract register (Form MBP-4). Despite the company's claims that transactions were at arm's length and in the ordinary course of business, they failed to provide supporting documentary evidence, leading to the adjudication order.
SHORT SUMMARY
Every company registered under this statute or any other as prescribed is required to disclose related party transactions, under Sections 188 and 189 of the Company Act 2013. Every business that engages in related party transactions is required by Section 189 of the 2013 Company Act
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Articles
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Broadcasts
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited Articles Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
Sections 188 and 189 of the Companies Act 2013 are related to related party transactions, requiring disclosure and recording in a contract register.
Adani Power failed to enter details of related party transactions into the contract register (Form MBP-4) as required by Section 189 of the Companies Act 2013.
Adani Power argued that the transactions were at arm's length and in the ordinary course of business, thus not covered by Section 188, and therefore no penalty should be imposed.
The company was unable to produce documentary evidence to support its claim that the transactions were at arm's length and in the ordinary course of business.
When determining the penalty, the Adjudication Officer considers disproportionate gain or unfair advantage, loss caused to investors, and the repetitive nature of the default.
Companies must keep proof of transactions if they consider them to be at arm's length, and auditors should request this proof if not provided.