The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in Chennai has dismissed an insolvency petition filed by EY seeking Rs 3.11 crore in GST-related professional fees from Mobase India. The tribunal found that Mobase had raised a legitimate dispute regarding EY's entitlement to the outcome-based fee, as the GST proceedings were not yet final and the definition of 'success' was contested. The NCLT suggested that the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) might examine the professional and regulatory aspects of the fee arrangement.
TheNational Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai Bench, has dismissed an insolvency petition filed by EY against Mobase India Ltd. over a disputed professional fee linked to GST proceedings.
EY had claimed around Rs 3.11 crore, including interest, from Mobase towards an outcome-based fee under an engagement agreement. The fee was linked to the reduction in GST demands obtained in proceedings for the financial years 2019-20, 2020-21 and 2021-22.
The tribunal, however, found that Mobase had rais
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
BEST VALUE
3 Years PLAN
4999
(Excl. of GST ₹899)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience. 07941056694
FAQ :
The NCLT dismissed the claim because it found a genuine and pre-existing dispute between EY and Mobase India regarding EY's entitlement to the outcome-based fee, and the GST proceedings were not yet concluded.
EY was claiming approximately Rs 3.11 crore, including interest, as an outcome-based professional fee linked to reductions in GST demands.
Mobase India disputed EY's entitlement to the success fee and questioned whether the reductions in GST demand constituted the 'success' contemplated under their engagement agreement.
No, the GST proceedings relied upon by EY had not reached finality. Notably, an order for FY 2020-21 was later set aside by the Madras High Court.
Yes, the NCLT observed that the ICAI could examine the professional and regulatory aspects of the outcome-based fee arrangement if the services were rendered by professionals governed by its framework.
Yes, the NCLT's dismissal of the insolvency petition does not prevent EY from pursuing other legal remedies to adjudicate and recover its contractual claim.