Quick Summary
Introduction In a recent development, the Delhi High Court has intervened in a case involving a Chartered Accountant (CA) facing proceedings under the Companies Act for alleged professional misconduct. The CA, embroiled in a controversy over irregularities in claiming deductions under Section 80
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited News Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
3 MONTHS PLAN
999
(Excl of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The Delhi High Court has stayed the proceedings initiated by the National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) against a Chartered Accountant (CA).
Proceedings were initiated due to allegations of professional misconduct concerning irregularities in claiming tax deductions under Section 80 of the Income Tax Act for Queens Corp Limited.
The CA argued that the NFRA could only issue show cause notices to the auditor of the company under investigation, and he was not the auditor for Queens Corp Limited.
The CA's argument is based on Rule 4(1) of the National Financial Reporting Authority Rules, 2018, which he contends limits NFRA investigations to the company's auditor.
The proceedings have been stayed until the next scheduled hearing on May 07, 2024.
The decision may set a precedent for how regulatory bodies like the NFRA initiate proceedings and underscores the importance of procedural adherence in investigations.
CAclubindia
