CBIC Issues New Guidelines for Resolving CGST Act Interpretation Disputes During Audits



Quick Summary
The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has released new guidelines to standardise how disputes over the interpretation of the CGST Act are handled during audits. Instruction No. 03/2024-GST aims to ensure consistent application of the law and minimise the risk of legal challenges. This procedure applies to ongoing audits and encourages early reference to the Board's policy wings when taxpayers follow industry-standard interpretations that may differ from the tax authorities'.

On August 14, 2024, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) issued Instruction No. 03/2024-GST, outlining new procedures for handling disputes related to the interpretation of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act encountered during audits. This instruction is designed to ensure consistency and minimize litigation risks across the board.

New CGST Act Dispute Resolution Guidelines Issued

The undersigned is directed to say that the Board's Instruction No. 01/2023-24-GST (Inv.) dated 30-03-2024 has been issued providing guidelines for maintaining ease of doing business while engaging in investigation with regular taxpayers. The para 2(g) of said Instruction is -

"The scenario may arise in a CGST Zone where an issue investigated by one of the (Pr.) Commissioners is based on an interpretation of CGST Act/ Rules, notifications, circulars etc, and it is in the direction of proposing non-payment or short payment of tax, however, the background is that the taxpayer(s) is/are following, or have followed, a prevalent trade practice based on particular interpretation on that issue in the sector/industry. This scenario results in more than one interpretation and likelihood of litigation, change in practice etc.

In such cases, it is desirable that the zonal (Pr.) Chief Commissioner make a self-contained reference to the relevant policy wing of the Board i.e. the GST Policy or TRU. The endeavor, to make such reference before concluding investigation, and as much in advance, as is feasible, of the earliest due date for issuing of show cause notice, may be useful in promoting uniformity or avoiding litigation if the matter, after being processed, is amongst those that also gets placed before the GST Council."

The Board desires that during the process of audit, wherever the relevant CGST Audit (Pr.) Commissioner comes across the scenario described above, the Zonal (Pr.) Chief Commissioner should follow the procedure and endeavor prescribed by Board in para 2(g) of above Instruction. This applies also to on-going audit proceedings.

Official copy of the instruction has been attached

FAQ :

The new guidelines, issued as Instruction No. 03/2024-GST, aim to ensure consistency in interpreting the CGST Act during audits and to minimise litigation risks.

The guidelines were issued on August 14, 2024.

They address disputes arising from different interpretations of the CGST Act, Rules, notifications, or circulars encountered during tax audits, particularly when a taxpayer's practice differs from the tax authority's interpretation.

Zonal Chief Commissioners should make a reference to the relevant policy wing of the Board (GST Policy or TRU) before concluding an investigation, ideally before the due date for issuing a show cause notice.

Yes, the instruction states that it applies to ongoing audit proceedings as well.

The aim is to promote uniformity in interpretation and avoid litigation, especially when the matter might also be considered by the GST Council.




News posted by

Finance news reporter covering taxation, GST, income tax, business compliance, and economy updates. I simplify complex financial topics into easy-to-understand articles for professionals, taxpayers, and business owners on leading finance and tax platforms.

Comments :


More »


Popular News





CCI Pro