Income-tax Officer, Ward - 2(4),, Aurangabad Sanjay Atmaram Sarkate,, Aurangabad

Last updated: 20 May 2021
Quick Summary
The Income Tax Officer's appeal against Sanjay Atmaram Sarkate for the 2011-12 assessment year has been dismissed. The assessee argued that the tax effect involved was below the Rs. 50 Lakhs threshold set by recent CBDT circulars. Although the Revenue representative was unsure of the exact tax effect, the appeal was ultimately dismissed on these grounds.

Court :
ITAT Pune

Brief :
This appeal preferred by the Revenue emanates from the order of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-2, Aurangabad dated 11.09.2017 for the assessment year 2011-12 as per the ground of appeal on record.

Citation :
ITA No. 2823/PUN/2017

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Community
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
  • Profile Visitors
  • Link Social Profiles
  • Featured Job Posts
  • Pro Badge
  • Expert GST Guidance
  • Unlimited Forum Replies
  • Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)

BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)

3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)

View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 162
downloaded 258 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. CESTAT: Rajasthan Sales Tax Subsidy under RIPS 2010 Not includible in Excise Assessable Value
  2. CESTAT: Late Payment Charges in the Nature of Interest Not Taxable as Declared Service
  3. CESTAT: Educational Services Exempt Under Section 66D; Extended Period Cannot Be Invoked Without Wilful Suppression
  4. CESTAT: No Service Tax on Royalty under RCM if Mining Lease Was Executed Before 1 April 2016
  5. No pre-deposit required for filing appeal before the GSTAT against penalty-only orders where proceedings commenced prior to October 01 2025
  6. Refund cannot be withheld under Section 54(11) of the CGST Act merely because the Revenue contemplates filing an appeal
  7. Scope of Rectification under Section 161 of the CGST Act is Confined to Errors Apparent on the Face of Record
  8. Appellate Authority has no power to condone delay in filing appeal beyond the outer limit prescribed under Section 107(4) of the CGST Act
  9. CESTAT New Delhi: Sub-Contractor Separately Liable for Service Tax Regardless of Main Contractor's Discharge
  10. Cenvat Credit Cannot Be Denied Merely on Third-Party Statements Without Corroborative Evidence

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member SANJAY GOSALIASANJAY GOSALIAPro Member Paramjeet Singh ThakurParamjeet Singh ThakurPro Member PriyanakPriyanakPro Member Fredrick SamrajFredrick SamrajPro Member ca kailash chander singhalca kailash chander singhal
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Latest Job Openings

View all
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 September 2026
Articles

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 25 August 2026
CA Article's

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 August 2026
Chartered Accountant - Financial Consolidation & Reporting

Synergy Keystone

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 11 September 2026
Audit Executive

RBSM Corporate Advisors Private Limited

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
19 August 2026
PAID ARTCILE ASSISTANT

My Legal Tax Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

Noida

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 07 September 2026
CA Articles

Kothari Jain Patil & Chartered Accountants

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
04 September 2026
CA inter Or ca finalist

A Jaiswal and company

Lucknow

CA Final

View Details
Company
17 August 2026
Chartered Accountant with US GAAP Experience

Austin Med Solutions Pvt Ltd

Bengaluru

CA

View Details