High Court has power to condone delay in filing appeal


Last updated: 18 December 2024
Quick Summary
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has ruled that while Section 107 of the CGST Act does not permit condonation of appeal filing delays beyond the specified periods, the High Court retains the power to do so under Article 226 of the Constitution. This means that even if an appeal is filed late and beyond the time limits set by the CGST Act, the High Court can still consider it on its merits in exceptional circumstances.

Court :
Punjab & Haryana High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Vasudeva Engineering v. Union of India [CWP No. 27468, 18475, 26077, 18591 and 5397 of 2023 (O&M) dated October 24, 2024] held that provisions under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act") are not condemnable to Limitation Act, 1963 ("the Limitation Act") and therefore, delay cannot be further condoned. However, High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has the power to condone delay in filing appeal.

Citation :
CWP No. 27468, 18475, 26077, 18591 and 5397 of 2023 (O&M) dated October 24, 2024

The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of Vasudeva Engineering v. Union of India [CWP No. 27468, 18475, 26077, 18591 and 5397 of 2023 (O&M) dated October 24, 2024] held that provisions under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act") are not condemnable to Limitation Act, 1963 ("the Limitation Act") and therefore, delay cannot be further condoned. However, High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has the power to condone delay in filing appeal.

Facts:

M/s Vasudeva Engineering ("the Petitioner") had paid the pre-deposit for hearing on the appeal. It was an admitted position that the appeals had been filed beyond the limitation period that even beyond the period which could be condoned under the provisions of Section 107 and Section 35(1) of the CGST Act while the said provision provides for a period of three months for filing of an appeal with additional period of 30 days for condonation, the provisions under Section 107 of the CGST Act are not condemnable to Limitation Act. Therefore, the delay cannot be further condoned.

Issue:

Whether the Hon'ble High Court has power to condone delay in filing appeal?

Held:

The Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in CWP No. 27468, 18475, 26077, 18591 and 5397 of 2023 (O&M) held as under:

· Noted that, the condonation being provided under the CGST Act itself, in view thereto, the action of the Appellate Authority in rejecting the appeals cannot be said to be illegal or unjustified. However, Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M/s Tecnimont Pvt Ltd. v. State of Punjab and others [2019 INSC 1054], the similar issue relating to non-deposit of in cases where the pre-deposit had not been made, and the appeals were rejected before the Supreme Court where the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed that the order was not unjustified in rejecting the appeals but left it open for the High Court to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 considering the facts of each case to condone the requirement of pre-deposit in the case of M/s Steel Kart v. State of Haryana and others [CWP-17348-2024] before this Court, examined an issue where the order challenged in appeal, since it was not in the knowledge of the petitioner within the time prescribed and this Court exercised its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution and directed the Appellate Authority to consider the appeal of the petitioner(s) on merits without going into the question of delay/limitation. Hence, it is apparent as to why the concerned Appellate Authority would be bound by the provisions of the CGST Act, the same would not curtail the powers in any manner provided under Article 226 of the Constitution of the Court to exercise its jurisdiction in the facts of the case and condoned the delay.

· Held that, the powers to hear the appeal in terms of Section 107 of the CGST Act would not be subject to filing of an appeal within the time prescribed wherein, it would not in any manner deprive a person from claiming the right of hearing of an appeal by filing of a writ petition before this Hon'ble High Court for condonation of delay.

Our Comments:

Section 107 of the CGST Act governs "Appeals to Appellate Authority". Section 107(1) of the CGST Act states that any person aggrieved by any decision or order passed under the CGST Act or the State Goods and Services Tax Act or the Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act by an adjudicating authority may appeal to such Appellate Authority as may be prescribed within three months from the date on which the said decision or order is communicated to such person.

For filing an appeal the statutory period is 90 days from the date of communication of the order, under the CGST Act. The appellate authority is empowered to condone delays up to a further 1 month if adequate cause is displayed. Beyond these 3+1 months, condonation of delay is not explicitly given under the CGST Act, directing to legal challenges and judicial interpretations.

OFFICIAL JUDGMENT COPY HAS BEEN ATTACHED

FAQ :

Yes, the High Court can condone delays in filing GST appeals, even if they are beyond the time limits specified in Section 107 of the CGST Act, by exercising its powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Under Section 107 of the CGST Act, an appeal must generally be filed within three months from the date the decision or order is communicated. An additional period of 30 days may be allowed for condonation of delay by the appellate authority.

No, the provisions under Section 107 of the CGST Act are not considered to be subject to the Limitation Act, 1963, meaning delays cannot be condoned under the Limitation Act itself.

Article 226 of the Constitution of India grants High Courts the power to issue writs, including those for the enforcement of fundamental rights and for any other purpose. This includes the power to direct authorities to act or refrain from acting, and to consider matters on their merits, even if procedural delays have occurred.

 

Comments




CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Company
23 July 2026
Semi qualified CA

Garg Bros & Associate CA

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
06 July 2026
Accountant

Agarwal Anoop and Associates

Noida

CA Final

View Details
Company
13 July 2026
AVP / VP - PCG Advisory

Workforce Connect

Mumbai

MBA

View Details
Company
05 July 2026
Financial Controller

NovumLake Partners

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Article Assistant or Paid Assistant

VIKAS VERMA & CO

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
06 July 2026
Chartered Accountant (Indirect Taxation)

Gowra Ventures Pvt Ltd

Hyderabad

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 11 July 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details