Court :
Madras High Court
Brief :
The Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Clear Secured Service Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner (ST) [Writ Petition No. 23402 of 2026, order dated July 01, 2026] held that the Revenue Department cannot confirm a tax proposal denying Input Tax Credit (“ITC”) solely on the ground that the supplier was subsequently declared non-existent, without duly examining the documentary evidence furnished by the assessee. Where the documents produced are found insufficient, the assessee must be afforded an opportunity to furnish additional evidence. Accordingly, the assessment order passed under Section 74 of the CGST Act was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.
Citation :
Writ Petition No. 23402 of 2026, order dated July 01, 2026
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience. 07941056694
Judgement posted by
Service
FCA, FCS LLB with21 Yrs of Experience inTaxation Indirect and Direct: Education Qualification: B.Com (Hons) Chartered Accountants Company Secretary LLB Qualified SAP FI/CO Consultants Professional Membership: Chairmanof Indirect Tax Committee of PHD Chamber of Commerce Member of Indirec ... Read more
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English