Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), vide an ex – parte interim order dated December 10, 2014, in the matter of Kalpbut Real Estate Limited (hereinafter referred to as KREL or the company) issued certain directions in respect of Kalpbut Rea

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘SEBI’) conducted an examination in the matter of fund mobilization by Alchemist Infra Realty Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as ‘AIRL’ / ‘Company’) to ascertain whether there was any v

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as, “SEBI”) conducted investigation in respect of trading of certain entities in the scrip of Bharti Airtel Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘BAL’/’Company’).

Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) received a letter dated September 19, 2019 from Vistara ITCL (India) Ltd. (‘Vistara’), a SEBI registered Debenture Trustee in which Vistara had provided a list of companies from which it had not receive

Unisys Softwares and Holding Industries Limited (hereinafter referred as “Unisys” or “the company”), is a company having its shares listed on BSE Ltd. (‘BSE’) and The Calcutta Stock Exchange Limited (‘CSE’). Securities and Exchange Board of India ("S

Unisys Softwares and Holding Industries Limited (hereinafter referred as “Unisys” or “the company”), is a company having its shares listed on BSE Ltd. (‘BSE’) and The Calcutta Stock Exchange Limited (‘CSE’). Securities and Exchange Board of India ("S

The Hon'ble HC, Karnataka in Bagmane Developers v. Union of India [W.P. No. 9430/2020 dated October 22, 2020] stayed demand of Rs. 62 crore in a writ petition challenging credit restriction under Section 17(5)(c) and (d) of Central Goods and Services

The Hon'ble HC, Rajasthan in the matter of Ravindra Singh Chaudhary vs. Union of India [D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20779/2019 dated October 16, 2020] held that Dream11's online fantasy sports games are not betting/gambling.

The Hon'ble HC (Division Bench), Madras in the case of Assistant Commissioner of Cost and Central Excise and Anr. vs. Sutherland Global Services Pvt. Ltd. & 2 Ors. [Writ Appeal No. 53/ 2020 dated October 16, 2020] set aside the order of Hon’ble Singl

The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the revision order passed by Ld. Principal CIT-4, Bengaluru for assessment year 2014-15 u/s 263 of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short]. The assessee is challenging the validity of revision orde