Amit Saroop Garg & Sons (HUF), Delhi vs ITO Ward -0 38(3), New Delhi

Last updated: 17 December 2020

Court :
ITAT New Delhi

Brief :
This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-13, New Delhi, Dated 21.01.2019, for the A.Y. 2014-2015.

Citation :
ITA.No.2058/Del./2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
DELHI BENCHES “A” : DELHI
BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND
SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA.No.2058/Del./2019
Assessment Year 2014-2015

Amit Saroop Garg & Sons
[HUF], PP-71, 1st Floor,
Pitam Pura,
Delhi – 110 034
PAN AAKHA2653M
(Appellant)

[vs.

The Income Tax Officer,
Ward – 38 (3), Room
No.1006, E-2 Block,
10th Floor, Pratyaksh Kar
Bhawan, Civic Centre,
JLN Marg, New Delhi
(Respondent)

For Assessee : Smt. Prem Lata Bansal, Sr. Advocate
Sh Divanshu Agarwal, Advocate
Sh Shivansh Bansal, Advocate
For Revenue : Shri Satpal Gulati, CIT-DR

Date of Hearing : 10.12.2020
Date of Pronouncement : 15.12.2020

ORDER

PER BHAVNESH SAINI, J.M.

This appeal by Assessee has been directed against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A)-13, New Delhi, Dated 21.01.2019, for the A.Y. 2014-2015.

2. Learned Counsel for the Assessee submitted thatassessee has opted to settle the dispute for the assessmentyear under appeal under the VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME,2020 and has applied Form Nos.1 and 2 for the same. FormNo.3 is awaited. She has, therefore, prayed that appeal of assessee may be dismissed as withdrawn, subject to issue of Form No.3 in favour of the assessee.

3. In view of the above submission of the Learned Counsel for the Assessee, appeal of assessee is dismissed aswithdrawn, subject to issue of Form No.3 in favour of the assessee.

To know more in details find the attachment file