Court :
Delhi
Brief :
The CESTAT, New Delhi, in M/s Mangalam Cement Ltd. v. Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, Udaipur, examined whether service tax was payable under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) on royalty paid for a mining lease for the period 1 April 2016 to 13 June 2017.
Citation :
Service Tax Misc Application No. 50067 of 2026
in
Service Tax Appeal No. 50781 of 2020
The appellant contended that its mining lease agreements had been executed before 1 April 2016 and, relying on various earlier CESTAT decisions, argued that royalty was not liable to service tax under RCM in such circumstances.
The Tribunal noted that the relevant mining lease agreements had not been produced before the lower authorities. Therefore, it set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to verify whether the agreements were actually executed before 1 April 2016.
Importantly, the Tribunal observed that where a mining lease agreement was executed prior to 1 April 2016, the assessee would not be liable to pay service tax under RCM and would be entitled to the benefit of Section 66D of the Finance Act, 1994. In such a case, no penalty would also be imposable.
Accordingly, the appeal was allowed by way of remand, with directions to the appellant to produce the mining lease agreements within seven days. The adjudicating authority was directed to pass an appropriate order within 60 days after verification and after providing an opportunity of hearing.
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English