CA; CS-Final (One Group); DISA (ICAI); I
442 Points
Posted on 07 February 2012
| Originally posted by : CA GIRISH |
 |
@ Prashant: Yes u can enjoy both the houses.And it was my misinterpretation of Act that u quoted u can not give New HP on rent.Well Let me correct this u can very well give it on Rent.
@ Gourav thanks buddy....It was chosen by my Dad means LORD OF MOUNTAINS which is SHANKAR BHAGWAN |
 |
Dear Girish,
I do not agree with your interpretation that u can very well give it on rent. In this connection please go through relevant portion of Sec-54F i.e. Proviso (b), which is reproduced as under: -
[Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall apply where -
(a) the assessee,—
(i) owns more than one residential house, other than the new asset, on the date of transfer of the original asset; or
(ii) purchases any residential house, other than the new asset, within a period of one year after the date of transfer of the original asset; or
(iii) constructs any residential house, other than the new asset, within a period of three years after the date of transfer of the original asset; and
(b) the income from such residential house, other than the one residential house owned on the date of transfer of the original asset, is chargeable under the head “Income from house property”.]
**********
If new house property is given on rent than it will be taxable under the head "Income from House Property" and in that event, in my opinion, the exemption u/s-54F will not be available. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks