PRACTICE
375 Points
Joined July 2008
Right Satyanarayananji - The fee of 3000/ is an insult . But some of our collegues are pursuing it . My friend told me that few used to deploy their Aricles and grab this amount . Some members do this if lot of branches are offered and the overall fees is ok
DISA / CISA qualification is ( directly indirectly ) insisted for empnelments . Because when there is a choice a member with these would be prefered . For Central Auditors I think at least 2 members should DISA / CISA qualified . Every where ( concurrent audit / CAG ) it asked whether CISA / DISA qualified .
But if you get C.E.R.T accredition oppurtunities are said to be better . Because IS audits of P.S.U fetch huge amounts ( I was told around 20 Lakhs ) But we need to be equipped for that . A big partnership with members havig specialised areas
Mr. Santhana krishnan is still there at the helm . Let us hope for the best
Recently I did FAFD & CONCURRENT AUDIT courses . Attendance was good . What I noticed is when other areas dry up we think of these certifications and other empanelment requirements. These become feather in the cap
One member asked during the session that despite the fee for concurrent audit being very low there are lot of applicants and whether this is attributed to poverty amongst the members . One corrected " it is not due to poverty but LIBERTY "