director remuneration
This query is : Resolved
15 July 2010
We are doing the audit of a small comany.Here no systematic monthly remuneration is paid to directors.With the amount of Directors expenses like children school fees etc director Remuneration booked.Is this right?
Whether any objection can be raised on it?
Is any provision of Co. Law or Sch VI attracted?
Whether any objection can be raised on it?
Is any provision of Co. Law or Sch VI attracted?
15 July 2010
The system fllowed by the Company is not correct. A Company should fix director remuneration and the same should be approved by the board by passing a resolution. The Company should pay the amount to director fixed by the Board in their Board Meeting.
15 July 2010
Agreed with the learned expert.
But still Companies are doing these ( basically Pvt. Ltd Companies.)
If you are an auditor of such Company then you can raise a question as to substantiate the Payments made to Directors ( i.e. Board resolution in this behalf)
If the resolutions are there and the same mentions clearly the structure of Directors Remuneration.
if there are no such resolutions you can put a question mark on the management.
Also refer to Companies Act Section 309,310 for the limit, etc.
But still Companies are doing these ( basically Pvt. Ltd Companies.)
If you are an auditor of such Company then you can raise a question as to substantiate the Payments made to Directors ( i.e. Board resolution in this behalf)
If the resolutions are there and the same mentions clearly the structure of Directors Remuneration.
if there are no such resolutions you can put a question mark on the management.
Also refer to Companies Act Section 309,310 for the limit, etc.
15 July 2010
In my opinion Private Co can do so. through there current account. They can withdraw against their remuneration as per their needs. Once the remuneration is fixed by board it is up to the director how he uses and withdraw the same.
Important thing is to check is that he may not withdraw more than its remuneration due. Otherwise 2(22)e of IT is attracted.
Important thing is to check is that he may not withdraw more than its remuneration due. Otherwise 2(22)e of IT is attracted.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- About TDS & Income Tax
- Under construction property in ITR
- Pass word to open justification report for Q1 for FY 2026-27
- Section 194JA & JB Income which ITR Form to use
- Scrutiny and reopening of past returns
- PPF interest-As Exempt Income disclosure
- Building tax payment deduction in rental Income
- Booth for sales promotion
- Upload Level ValidationITR3Category of Defect B/D
- F & O PROFIT REPORTING FOR AY 2026-27
- Indian IT Portal issue in computing tax as per UK-India DTAA
- Capital Gains on sale of residential flat
- PF Taxable Income
- Clarification on Tax Audit Applicability and Reporting of F&O Transactions in ITR-3
- Interest credited in FY2025-2026 & TDS therein by EPFO does not reflect in AIS or Form 26AS
- 44ad eligble money lending interest
- Taxation in the hands of Landowner under JDA
- Delisted shares sold in off market/ Rebate u/s87A
- In Exports Sales HSN details where to fill
- Opting out" of regime provided under subsection (1A) of Section 115BAC but Form 10IEA is not filed.
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
