What should be the treatment for registration expenses and preliminery expenses of partnership firm in accounts?

Dear experts,
We ordered to make our company's sign boards. Vendor gave a bill with VAT. We have not provided any material. Can u plz calrify whether?

- TDS under 194 C applicable?
- TDS under advertising applicable?

Ind as is applicable in November 2014 or not??

what is the defference of FORM NO. 16 (rule 31(1)(a))and FORM NO. 16 (rule 31(1)(b))
under income tax act.

can we issue a form 16 under rule 31(1)(b) of income tax act.

pls reply urgent. because i had issued the form no. 16 under rule 31(1)(b).

what is the procedure when intimation u/s 200a is received demanding interest on late payment?

please guide me for the registration procedure of partnership firm and related documents.

Dear Sir/ Madam,

I am providing briefly about the fact of the case:

Our client (Partnership firm) receive the invoice from the GTA (Goods Transport Agency). GTE Invoice shows the following information:
Freight paid Rs 15,000/-
Other charges Rs 5,000/-

Gross Total Rs 20,000/-
Service tax Rs 618
(Assume abatement taken)
Total of the bill 20,618
My client paid the full amount of Rs.20,618/-. The service tax liability will by our client as per the RCM. But my client paid the full amount along with the Service tax liability. I have the following question in my mind:
1)As per the RCM any transaction between specified person the liabiality shall be borne by the Service Receiver not by the provider. My client paid the service tax amount to Service provider. I do not what I have to do!
2)The limit of Rs Ten lakh is not applicable for the RCM as per the Notification number 33/2012- Service tax. Our client required to Service tax registration or not because our client is paying the Service tax amount to GTA.
Please help me because I have to take Decision.

What is the difference between business promotion expense & entertainment expense for the purpose of ITR 4?

Dear Friends,

I ve read some discussions on the above topic which concluded that section 185 overrides section 186 of the Act,2013, since Section 185 is a saving provision when Section 186 starts with a phrase " without prejudice to ................ ".

As far as my knowledge goes, this phrase applies only to sub section (1) of Section 186 which speaks about investment through investment companies.

Can we say that Section 186 prevails over Section 185?

One of my client companies is a partner in a firm and one of its directors is also a partner. Before the Act,2013, this Company has been providing security to a Bank which has granted loan to the firm.

Can you throw some light on this?

Hi, Can any one please let me know the latest date by which auditor can be appointed for the company formed on 29th March, 2014.