As 18 related party issue

This query is : Resolved 

01 December 2013 X Ltd. was an associate of MN Ltd. upto September 2013 but ceased to be an associate thereafter. Purchase & Sales transactions were undertaken by MN Ltd. with X Ltd. throughout FY 13-14.

Whether transactions with X Ltd. should be reported under Related Party Disclosure by MN Ltd. for FY 2013-14?
If yes, transactions upto September are only to be reported or for the whole year?

01 December 2013 AS-18 is for disclosure purpose. So disclosure should be made for entire 2013-14. Also a note should be given that MN Ltd cease to be associated of X Ltd.

02 December 2013 And if X Ltd. became a Related Party in October but was not a Related Party in first 6 months, then also transactions for whole year need to be disclosed?

02 December 2013 Yes even in that case transaction of whole year should be disclosed.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now


CCI Pro

Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
Featured 28 May 2026
SEMI QUALIFIED/ CA DROPOUTS/ ARTICLES

T R SOOD & CO

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
09 June 2026
Accounts Associate

S Madan and CO

New Delhi

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
Featured 15 June 2026
Senior Auditor

N. Dhawan & Co

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
26 May 2026
Audit executive

vdsr & co LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
16 June 2026
Sr. Associate / Assistant Manager | TAS / FDD

Boutique Investment Bank & Transaction Advisory Firm

Gurgaon

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 08 June 2026
Internal & Taxation Article

O P Bagla & Co LLP

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
29 May 2026
Finance Head

Bhawar Sales Corporation

Chennai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 20 June 2026
Articleship

RB KESHRI & CO

Mumbai

B.Com

View Details