banner_ad

As 18 related party issue

This query is : Resolved 

01 December 2013 X Ltd. was an associate of MN Ltd. upto September 2013 but ceased to be an associate thereafter. Purchase & Sales transactions were undertaken by MN Ltd. with X Ltd. throughout FY 13-14.

Whether transactions with X Ltd. should be reported under Related Party Disclosure by MN Ltd. for FY 2013-14?
If yes, transactions upto September are only to be reported or for the whole year?

01 December 2013 AS-18 is for disclosure purpose. So disclosure should be made for entire 2013-14. Also a note should be given that MN Ltd cease to be associated of X Ltd.

02 December 2013 And if X Ltd. became a Related Party in October but was not a Related Party in first 6 months, then also transactions for whole year need to be disclosed?

02 December 2013 Yes even in that case transaction of whole year should be disclosed.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now


CCI Pro

Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news



Answer Query



Company
Featured 02 May 2026
Senior Executive

hitesh chandwani & co

Pune

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 29 April 2026
Manager- Finance and Compliance

Naveen Fintech Pvt Ltd

Kolkata

CA Inter

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured ARTICLESHIP 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 14 March 2026
Associate CA

N N V Satish&co

Hyderabad

CA

View Details