As 18 related party issue


This query is : Resolved 

01 December 2013 X Ltd. was an associate of MN Ltd. upto September 2013 but ceased to be an associate thereafter. Purchase & Sales transactions were undertaken by MN Ltd. with X Ltd. throughout FY 13-14.

Whether transactions with X Ltd. should be reported under Related Party Disclosure by MN Ltd. for FY 2013-14?
If yes, transactions upto September are only to be reported or for the whole year?

01 December 2013 AS-18 is for disclosure purpose. So disclosure should be made for entire 2013-14. Also a note should be given that MN Ltd cease to be associated of X Ltd.

02 December 2013 And if X Ltd. became a Related Party in October but was not a Related Party in first 6 months, then also transactions for whole year need to be disclosed?

02 December 2013 Yes even in that case transaction of whole year should be disclosed.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro



Answer Query



Company
12 October 2026
Chartered Accountant - Internal Audit

HKC | Chartered Accountants & Business Advisors

Ludhiana

CA

View Details
Company
30 September 2026
Senior Accountant

Codeboard Technology

Chennai

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 September 2026
CA Article Assistant

CA Suraj Garg & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 01 October 2026
Articled Assistant

KPSN & Associates LLP

Chennai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
23 October 2026
Sr. Accountant

SANKARAN & KRISHNAN

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
26 September 2026
Chartered Accountant

pushpganga ventures

Pune

CA

View Details
Company
19 October 2026
Accountant

Jari Saree Center

New Delhi

Others

View Details
Company
14 October 2026
Asst. Manager/Dy Manager (Costing)

manufacturing

Pune

CMA

View Details