As 18 related party issue
This query is : Resolved
01 December 2013
X Ltd. was an associate of MN Ltd. upto September 2013 but ceased to be an associate thereafter. Purchase & Sales transactions were undertaken by MN Ltd. with X Ltd. throughout FY 13-14.
Whether transactions with X Ltd. should be reported under Related Party Disclosure by MN Ltd. for FY 2013-14?
If yes, transactions upto September are only to be reported or for the whole year?
Whether transactions with X Ltd. should be reported under Related Party Disclosure by MN Ltd. for FY 2013-14?
If yes, transactions upto September are only to be reported or for the whole year?
01 December 2013
AS-18 is for disclosure purpose. So disclosure should be made for entire 2013-14. Also a note should be given that MN Ltd cease to be associated of X Ltd.
02 December 2013
And if X Ltd. became a Related Party in October but was not a Related Party in first 6 months, then also transactions for whole year need to be disclosed?
02 December 2013
Yes even in that case transaction of whole year should be disclosed.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Registry of flat in 3 names
- Taxability with reference to DTAA
- TDS on Bank charges to company
- TDS on payment of Event fees to foreign Party
- Capital Gain on sale of Listed Equity Shares
- Regarding TDS 194Q w.e.f 1 April 2025
- TDS Rent 94I
- STCG on equity shares/ETF-sundeep
- Forms to be file after INC 20A
- DIR 12 for appointment and resignation
- House Property - Rental Income of HUF
- E invoice generation using offline tool
- Does non filing of income tax return considered as opting out of 44AD
- Salary JV Entry
- Coparcener loan to HUF
- Delayed payment of GST on RCM basis renting of property
- Recovery of gst
- 264 Petition
- Invoice raised in March and Stock Received In April which date important
- Outside doctors fee in P&l Account
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
