Whether Rental Income or Business Income ?

The question whether income from property should invariably be taxed under the head ?income from house property? is to be decided after taking into consideration the cumulative effect of all factors prevailing in a given case. The Courts have formulated different tests to determine the head under which such income can be taxed. Merely because income is attached to immovable property, it cannot be the sole factor for assessment of such income as ?income from house property?. The primary   of the assessee while exploiting the property has to be seen. If it is found that the main intention is for let out of property or any portion thereof, the same must be considered as rental income or income assessable under the head ?income from? house property?. In case, it is found that the main intention is to exploit the .immovable property by way of commercial activities^, in that event it must be held as ?business income?. It is, therefore, clearly born out that the main test to determine the head under which the income from immovable property be taxed is the purpose for which the property was exploited. If it is exploited commercially in the course of carrying on in business activity, then the income arising therefrom would be assessable under the head ?business income?. No abstract or straight jacket formula can be devised to determine conclusively as to under which head ?income from property? would fall. All the relevant facts and circumstances are necessarily to be looked into to decide the character of income. If the facts of a given case are that the assessee was doing a complex commercial activity by exploiting the immovable property, then the income would be assessable under the head ?business?. If, on the other hand, the property or space is simply let out by the assessee and the rental income is earned, it would be assessed under the head ?income from house property?. Thus, the decisive test is. the true nature of activity carried out: by the assessee while letting out the property.


?Decided by: ITAT, DELHI BENCHES `F?: NEW DELHI,?In The case of: Bigg Investments & Finance Pvt. Ltd. v.DCIT,?Appeal No.: ITA Nos. 5367 & 5368/Del/04,?Decided on: April 30, 2009.

?

?

? CA Pankaj Galhtora

? P.K. Vasudeva & Co.

? 99157-93007


21665 Views 3 Likes Comment   Share Income Tax   Report


Published by


CA (Tax advisory)

If you want to know about CPA and download notes then click the link below www.caclubindia.com/share_files/becker-cpa-review-sample-notes--22920.asp www.caclubindia.com/share_files/files_display_list_by_member.asp My best Article www.caclubindia.com/articles/no-tds-on-service-tax-component-4384.asp

CCI Pro

Comments


Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members

Follow us
add to google news

CCI Articles

submit article


Company
Featured 28 March 2026
CA Final

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 19 March 2026
Article Assistant

Gupta Sachdeva & Co. Chartered Accountants

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 13 April 2026
GST CONSULTANCY

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details
Company
Featured 28 March 2026
Accountant

Ashok Amol & Associates

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 14 April 2026
GST CONSULTANT

Abhishek G Agrawal & Co.

Korba

CA Final

View Details