Whether Rental Income or Business Income ?

The question whether income from property should invariably be taxed under the head ?income from house property? is to be decided after taking into consideration the cumulative effect of all factors prevailing in a given case. The Courts have formulated different tests to determine the head under which such income can be taxed. Merely because income is attached to immovable property, it cannot be the sole factor for assessment of such income as ?income from house property?. The primary   of the assessee while exploiting the property has to be seen. If it is found that the main intention is for let out of property or any portion thereof, the same must be considered as rental income or income assessable under the head ?income from? house property?. In case, it is found that the main intention is to exploit the .immovable property by way of commercial activities^, in that event it must be held as ?business income?. It is, therefore, clearly born out that the main test to determine the head under which the income from immovable property be taxed is the purpose for which the property was exploited. If it is exploited commercially in the course of carrying on in business activity, then the income arising therefrom would be assessable under the head ?business income?. No abstract or straight jacket formula can be devised to determine conclusively as to under which head ?income from property? would fall. All the relevant facts and circumstances are necessarily to be looked into to decide the character of income. If the facts of a given case are that the assessee was doing a complex commercial activity by exploiting the immovable property, then the income would be assessable under the head ?business?. If, on the other hand, the property or space is simply let out by the assessee and the rental income is earned, it would be assessed under the head ?income from house property?. Thus, the decisive test is. the true nature of activity carried out: by the assessee while letting out the property.


?Decided by: ITAT, DELHI BENCHES `F?: NEW DELHI,?In The case of: Bigg Investments & Finance Pvt. Ltd. v.DCIT,?Appeal No.: ITA Nos. 5367 & 5368/Del/04,?Decided on: April 30, 2009.

?

?

? CA Pankaj Galhtora

? P.K. Vasudeva & Co.

? 99157-93007


21672 Views 3 Likes Comment   Share Income Tax   Report


About the Author

CA (Tax advisory)

If you want to know about CPA and download notes then click the link below www.caclubindia.com/share_files/becker-cpa-review-sample-notes--22920.asp www.caclubindia.com/share_files/files_display_list_by_member.asp My best Article www.caclubindia.com/articles/no-tds-on-service-tax-component-4384.asp


Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro

CCI Articles

submit article


Company
06 July 2026
Chartered Accountant (Indirect Taxation)

Gowra Ventures Pvt Ltd

Hyderabad

CA

View Details
Company
20 July 2026
Senior GST Executive

Chandak Agarwal & Co

Mumbai

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
21 July 2026
Chartered Accountant

Keshri & Associates

Thiruvananthapuram

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 11 July 2026
Article

SNCO

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
28 July 2026
Senior accountant

RJ Public School

Bengaluru

B.Com

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 15 July 2026
CA Articles

Kinjal H Shah & Co.

Mumbai

CA Foundation

View Details
Company
14 July 2026
Senior Executive/ Manager

H S SHARMA AND CO

Pune

CA Final

View Details
Company
22 July 2026
Senior Chartered Accountant

SKSS

Patna

CA

View Details