Section 35ABB: Expenditure for Obtaining a License to Operate Telecommunication Services



Quick Summary
This article details Section 35ABB, outlining the tax treatment for expenditure incurred in obtaining a telecommunication services license. It explains how capital expenditure can be deducted over the license's life, the rules for selling a license, and how capital sums realised affect taxable income. The section also covers specific scenarios like demergers and clarifies that assets qualifying for deduction under this section are not eligible for depreciation.

In this article, I have explained the provisions related to Expenditure for obtaining a license to operate telecommunication services.

1. In case any capital expenditure is incurred for acquiring a license to operate telecommunication services and actual payment has been made, a deduction of an amount equal to the appropriate fraction shall be allowed in every previous year during which the license shall be in force. 

Appropriate fraction = actual payment made x 1/Number of previous years for which the fee is paid.

"Actual payment has been made" means the actual payment of expenditure irrespective of the previous year in which liability for the expenditure was incurred according to the method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee

Telecommunication License Expenditure: Deductions and Tax Rules

2. Any expenditure incurred to acquire any right to operate telecommunication services in India before the commencement of business shall be deemed to have been incurred in the year in which business commences and shall be written off in the same manner.

3. In case the licence is sold and capital sum realized from transfer is less than the expenditure remaining unallowed shall be fully allowed to be debited in the year in which it is sold.

 

 4. In case the capital sum realised is more than the amount of expenditure remaining unallowed, the difference between the money realised and amount remaining unallowed shall be chargeable tax as income under the head Profits and gain of business and profession in the previous year in which license is transferred but it shall not exceed the amount which has been written off so far. In case the license is transferred in the year in which business is not in existence, even then this provision shall be applicable as if business is in existence.

5. In case licence is transferred wholly or in part and capital sum realised is not less than the expenditure incurred remaining unallowed, no deduction for such expenditure shall be allowed in the year in which such licence is transferred and in any subsequent previous year.

 

6. In case any part of the licence is sold and money realized is more than the unallowed amount and the excess amount does not exceed the amount allowed so far, such excess shall be taxable as business profit. In case the amount realized does not exceed the unallowed value, the difference can be written off in the remaining number of years.

7. Where under a scheme of demerger, the license is sold by the demerged company to the resulting Indian Company the sub-clauses (2), (3) and (4) shall not be applicable. Note. In case deduction of any expenditure is allowed under this section, such asset shall not qualify for depreciation under section 32(1).
 

FAQ :

The appropriate fraction is calculated as the actual payment made multiplied by 1 divided by the number of previous years for which the fee is paid.

Expenditure incurred to acquire a right to operate telecommunication services before business commencement is deemed to have been incurred in the year the business commences and is written off in the same manner.

If the capital sum realised from selling the license is less than the remaining unallowed expenditure, the unallowed amount can be fully debited in the year of sale.

If the capital sum realised is more than the unallowed expenditure, the difference is chargeable as business income in the year of transfer, but it cannot exceed the amount written off so far.

Yes, sub-clauses (2), (3), and (4) of Section 35ABB do not apply if a license is sold by a demerged company to a resulting Indian Company under a demerger scheme.

No, if a deduction is allowed under Section 35ABB for any expenditure, that asset cannot qualify for depreciation under Section 32(1).


7291 Views 1 Likes Comment   Share Income Tax   Report


About the Author

student

Comments :

Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro

CCI Articles

submit article