ITC reversal in case of supplier found bogus or non existent



Quick Summary
This article addresses a significant issue within GST law where Input Tax Credit (ITC) can be reversed if a supplier is later found to be bogus or non-existent. It highlights the practice of blocking the recipient's e-credit ledger under Rule 86A without providing the taxpayer a chance to be heard, even for genuine purchases. The piece questions whether ITC should be denied to bonafide purchasers when all documentation is valid and the supply actually occurred.

Even after completing 5 years, one gets the feeling that GST is still an evolving law. Lot many changes are taking place with almost every GST council meeting. There are still some burning issues which are yet to be ironed out and decisively settled. These burning issues have been a bone of contention between department and the tax payers.

One such burning issue is non existence of the supplier in departmental enquiry or verification. In other words the supplier who passed on the input tax credit to other registered persons, was found to be bogus/non existent or not conducting business from his registered business place. In such cases rule 86A envisages blocking of e credit ledger of the recipient by the proper officer. meaning thereby that if supplier found non existent or bogus post verification when such verification took place in later period that is after a considerable period of time from the purchase transaction.

ITC Reversal: Bogus Supplier Issues Under GST

The officers in such cases, in exercise of their powers under rule 86A have been blocking the e credit ledger of the recipient without going into the merits and facts and circumstances of the case in one sided manner. No opportunity of being heard is provided to the tax payer and even the rule itself does not make any provision for it.

Now the question arises whether input tax credit may be denied in the hands of the bonafide purchaser where the purchase is bonafide and genuine, the purchaser is in possession of valid tax invoices and actual supply of goods also took place. Moreover when the purchase was made, the supplier was active on the portal and the purchaser by no means could have ascertained that the supplier is bogus or would become non existence at a later date, when there is no connivance between the two.

In such circumstances, what defence is available to the bona fide buyer? What should be the arguments to be put forth before the GST officers? are there any judgments favoring the buyers in such cases?

 

For answers to these questions and detailed discussion on this vital aspect, one can visit the youtube video posted on the tax express channel. The link is provided hereinbelow:

 


13365 Views 1 Likes Comment   Share GST   Report


About the Author

M Com FCS LLB M-AIMA

M.Com., FCS, LLB, M-AIMA, enrolled GST practitioner and tax consultantfrom Rajasthan having 12 years of experience in the field of income tax, GST and corporate law matters.

Comments :

Related Articles


Loading


Popular Articles





CCI Pro

CCI Articles

submit article


Company
18 August 2026
Audit Assistant - Remote / Work From Home

CA ANOOP P K & ASSOCIATES

Kozhikode

CA Inter

View Details
Company
07 August 2026
Chartered Accountant

Devesh Garg and co

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 26 August 2026
Article Assistant

ANIVESH CONSULTANTS LLP

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 14 August 2026
Article Assistant

N J Suresh & Associates

Bengaluru

CA Inter

View Details
Company
11 August 2026
Manager / Senior Manager - Statutory Audit

CommerceCareer

New Delhi

CA

View Details
Company
21 August 2026
Accountant

A G International

Kolkata

B.Com

View Details
Company
12 August 2026
Deputy Manager - Finance

RoamPrime Technologies Private Limited

Bengaluru

CA

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 05 August 2026
CA associate

Arun Deepak and Company

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
FOLLOW
US ON