The Supreme Court is set to examine a significant £33,000 crore income tax claim against Jaypee Infratech (JIL). This review comes after the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) included the tax liability in the acquisition plan by the Suraksha consortium, which was approved to complete JIL's stalled projects. The court has requested a detailed affidavit from the Central Board of Direct Taxes and will hear arguments on why the tax directives should be overturned, a decision that could impact thousands of homebuyers.
In a pivotal move, the Supreme Court has stepped in to assess the contentious ₹33,000 crore tax claim imposed on Jaypee Infratech Ltd (JIL), marking a crucial juncture in the ongoing legal saga that has left 22,000 homebuyers in limbo.
On April 15, 2024, the apex court announced its decision to s
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
3 MONTHS PLAN
999
(Excl of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The Supreme Court is reviewing a contentious £33,000 crore income tax claim made against Jaypee Infratech Ltd (JIL).
The tax claim affects 22,000 homebuyers who are awaiting the completion of their properties.
The NCLT approved the acquisition of JIL by the Suraksha consortium. The NCLAT later endorsed Suraksha's plan, including the tax liabilities, after the Income Tax department abstained from objecting during NCLT proceedings.
The Supreme Court has directed the Central Board of Direct Taxes to provide a detailed affidavit within a month and has summoned the Commissioner of Income Tax, Noida, to justify the tax directives.
The case is significant as it scrutinises the inclusion of tax liabilities in insolvency resolution plans, potentially impacting the integrity of the framework and the decision-making power of Creditors' Committees.