The Supreme Court of India has expressed strong disapproval of the widespread 'freebie culture' adopted by various states, warning that such indiscriminate distribution of free goods and services could severely damage the nation's economic development and fiscal stability. The court questioned the rationale behind universal subsidy schemes, particularly when states are already facing revenue deficits, and highlighted that these populist measures often come at the expense of crucial infrastructure development and job creation.
Supreme Court Questions Blanket Freebie Schemes by States
The Supreme Court of India on Thursday delivered strong remarks against the growing "freebies culture" across states, cautioning that indiscriminate distribution of free goods and services could seriously undermine Indias economic developmen
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
The Supreme Court is concerned that the indiscriminate distribution of free goods and services by states could seriously undermine India's economic development and fiscal stability.
The court was hearing a plea challenging Rule 23 of the Electricity (Amendment) Rules, 2024, which restricts blanket subsidies and requires cost-reflective electricity tariffs.
No, the court clarified that targeted welfare measures aimed at economically weaker sections are justified. However, extending benefits universally without assessing financial capacity is a concern.
The court noted that these schemes can strain public finances, potentially leading to revenue deficits, and may come at the cost of infrastructure development and job creation.
Chief Justice Surya Kant remarked that several states appear focused primarily on paying salaries and distributing largesse, leaving limited fiscal space for long-term nation-building initiatives.