The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has refused to approve a proposed merger between three companies. The tribunal cited significant concerns regarding tax evasion and money laundering, stating the merger appeared designed to artificially inflate share values and legitimise illicit transactions. The income tax department had previously flagged the transferee company as a 'conduit paper company' involved in dubious dealings, a view supported by the NCLT's findings that the transactions were mere 'accommodation entries' controlled by one individual. Consequently, the merger was deemed unfair, unreasonable, and contrary to the public interest.
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has rejected a merger application involving three companies, citing serious concerns about the legality of the proposed amalgamation. According to the tribunal, the merger aimed to "legitimize paper transactions" to artificially inflate share values, evade taxes, and facilitate money laundering.
The decision, delivered by Members Harnam Singh Thakur and Subrata Kumar Dash, follows the income tax department's claims that a significant tax demand was pen
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience. 011-411-70713
FAQ :
The NCLT rejected the merger due to serious concerns about tax evasion and money laundering, finding that the proposed amalgamation aimed to legitimise paper transactions for illicit purposes.
The allegations included using the merger to artificially inflate share values, evade taxes, and facilitate money laundering, with the transferee company described as a 'conduit paper company' involved in dubious transactions.
The income tax department claimed a significant tax demand was pending against the transferee company and had reopened the case, labelling it a 'conduit paper company'.
The NCLT's review supported the income tax department's view, concluding that the financial activities indicated the transactions were 'accommodation entries' controlled by a single individual.
No, the NCLT concluded that the merger was unfair, unreasonable, and not in the public interest.