Quick Summary
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has reprimanded a Chartered Accountant for failing to exercise due diligence while certifying Form AOC-4 filed with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). The order was passed by the Disciplinary Committee (Bench-IV) under Section 21B(3) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949, in the matter titled Shri Vijaya Simha Reddy, Deputy Registrar of Companies vs. CA. Rakesh Kant Khandelwal. Background of the Case The complaint was filed by the
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
- No Ads
- WhatsApp Community
- Daily E-Newsletter
- Unlimited News Access
- Profile Visitors
- Link Social Profiles
- Featured Job Posts
- Pro Badge
- Expert GST Guidance
- Unlimited Forum Replies
- Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
BEST VALUE
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
3 Months PLAN
999
(Excl. of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
Form AOC-4 is a form filed with the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) to submit financial statements and audit reports of a company.
The Chartered Accountant was accused of failing to exercise due diligence while certifying Form AOC-4, as the attached financial statements and audit reports did not bear original signatures, only 'SD/-' markings.
Section 134(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, mandates that financial statements must be duly signed by authorised directors. Rule 8 of the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014, requires that scanned documents attached to e-forms must be copies of originally signed documents.
The auditor argued that there was no explicit statutory instruction to verify original signatures on uploaded copies, that the defect was curable, and that the omission was an oversight due to reliance on the MCA's instruction kit.
The ICAI Disciplinary Committee found the Chartered Accountant guilty of professional misconduct and ordered a reprimand.
The ruling serves as a reminder that certification of MCA forms carries statutory responsibility, due diligence includes verifying that scanned attachments bear actual signatures, and procedural lapses in electronic filings can lead to disciplinary action.
CAclubindia
