The Supreme Court has ruled that statutory bodies like the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) are entitled to income tax exemption if the fees they charge are nominal and primarily cover their operational costs. The court clarified that professional regulatory bodies, established by statute to set standards and enforce them, do not inherently engage in business activities. However, if these bodies charge significantly higher fees than their costs or offer services at inflated prices, these receipts may be considered commercial, and the body must then comply with specific limits to maintain its charitable purpose status.
The Supreme Court has pronounced a significant judgment on the scope of exemption for charitable purposes under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act 1961 in relation to statutory authorities and professional bodies.
One among the appeals related to the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI). The revenue department disputed the tax exemption to ICAI. However, ICAI contended that its activities are not profit oriented and submitted that the fees collected from the students are utiliz
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
BEST VALUE
3 Years PLAN
4999
(Excl. of GST ₹899)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience. 07941056694
FAQ :
Yes, statutory bodies like the ICAI can claim income tax exemption if the amounts they charge are nominal and used to cover their costs.
The revenue department disputed the ICAI's tax exemption, while the ICAI argued that its activities were not profit-oriented and that collected fees were used for infrastructure development and capital expenditure.
The Supreme Court held that bodies created by statute to regulate professions, prescribe compulsory courses, and monitor members do not automatically carry on business or commercial activities.
Income may be considered commercial if the body charges fees significantly higher than costs (with more than a nominal mark-up) or provides services like registration or coaching at markedly higher prices.
If receipts are deemed commercial, the regulatory body must comply with the quantitative limits prescribed in the proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act to be considered for 'charitable purpose' exemption.
Yes, the ruling also applies to statutory bodies that certify products based on qualification standards, treating them similarly to professional regulatory bodies.