The Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) has issued notices to more than 12 food and beverage companies, demanding ₹3,000 crore in unpaid GST. The notices relate to the alleged improper payment of GST on trademark usage by franchises and outlets operating in states different from their parent companies' registrations. DGGI argues that brand usage by entities in other states constitutes a taxable service, even without direct monetary exchange, under GST law.
The Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) has issued show-cause notices to more than a dozen food and beverage companies, citing improper GST payment on trademark usage by their franchises and outlets located outside their home states. The notices, sent in early August, demand a total of ₹3,000 crore from the companies, covering the period from July 2017 when GST was introduced.
According to DGGI, franchises and outlets operating in states other than where the pare
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
1 Year PLAN
1999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
2 Years PLAN
3499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
BEST VALUE
3 Years PLAN
4999
(Excl. of GST ₹899)
View all CCI PRO benefits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience. 07941056694
FAQ :
The Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) has issued the notices.
The DGGI is demanding a total of ₹3,000 crore from the companies.
The notices cite improper GST payment on trademark usage by franchises and outlets located outside their home states.
The notices cover the period from July 2017, when GST was introduced.
Tax authorities argue that brand usage by a franchise or branch in a different state qualifies as a service provided by the head office, which is taxable under GST legislation.
Industry experts warn that this interpretation could significantly increase compliance burdens and create additional tax liabilities for companies, especially if they cannot claim full input tax credit.