ICAI Central Council Member Dhiraj Khandelwal has provided clarification regarding the National Financial Reporting Authority's (NFRA) order imposing a Rs 1 crore penalty on audit firm M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj. Khandelwal highlighted differences in audit opinions, particularly concerning the judgment on Expected Credit Loss (ECL) provisions for loan assets. He also pointed out discrepancies in audit planning meeting timings and the documentation of agreements on audit issues.
In a recent development, CCM Dhiraj Khandelwal has addressed the concerns on X surrounding the NFRA order imposing a significant penalty on Audit Firm M/s Dhiraj Dheeraj. Amidst the controversy, Khandelwal provides a detailed clarification, shedding light on the facts and nuances of the case.
Daily Limit Reached
You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free News
Subscribe to
CCI PRO
for unlimited access
Why Upgrade to
CCI PRO?
-
No Ads
-
WhatsApp Community
-
Daily E-Newsletter
-
Unlimited News Access
-
Profile Visitors
-
Link Social Profiles
-
Featured Job Posts
-
Pro Badge
-
Expert GST Guidance
-
Unlimited Forum Replies
-
Download Content in PDF
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Excl. of GST ₹629)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Excl. of GST ₹359)
3 MONTHS PLAN
999
(Excl of GST ₹179)
View all CCI PRO benfits
Already a PRO member?
Login here
for an ad-free experience.
FAQ :
ICAI Central Council Member Dhiraj Khandelwal has clarified the NFRA order.
The NFRA order imposed a penalty of Rs 1 crore on the audit firm M/s Dhiraj & Dheeraj.
There was a difference between the adverse opinion from NFRA and the qualified opinion from the auditor regarding audit findings.
The adequacy of the Expected Credit Loss (ECL) provision judgment on standard loan assets, including overdue loans, was identified as a judgmental issue.
Yes, a discrepancy was noted between a clean report from a resigned auditor in previous years and a qualified report issued later.