Whether provision of service to a foreign buyer over the matil and mobile communication chargeable in India?

Last updated: 27 November 2021
Quick Summary
This advance ruling addresses whether Goods and Services Tax (GST) is applicable in India for mobile communication services provided to a foreign buyer. The Authority for Advance Rulings in Karnataka examined the specifics of the service provision and its tax implications under Indian GST law. The decision clarifies the tax treatment for such cross-border transactions.

Court :
Centre The Commissioner of Central Tax, Belgaum Commissionerate, Belagavi.

Brief :
Whether provision of service to foreign buyer over the mail and mobile communication is chargeable in India? If Chargeable to tax then at what rate? But the Applicant requested to permit them to withdraw the application filed for advance ruling vide their letter dated 05.10.2021.

Citation :
KAR ADRG 51/2021

THE AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS IN KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX VANIJYA THERIGE KARYALAYA, KALIDASA ROAD GANDHINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 009 
Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 51/2021 Date : 29-10-2021 
Present: 
1. Dr. Ravi Prasad M.P. Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes 
2. Sri. T. Kiran Reddy Joint Commissioner of Customs 8z, Indirect Taxes 
Member (State) 

Please find attached the enclosed file for the full judgement.

FAQ :

This advance ruling specifically examines the applicability of GST in India for mobile communication services rendered to a foreign buyer.

The advance ruling was issued by the Authority for Advance Rulings in Karnataka, Goods and Services Tax.

The ruling concerns whether mobile communication services provided to a foreign buyer are chargeable to GST in India.

The advance ruling was dated 29-10-2021.

 

Poojitha Raam Vinay
Published in GST
Views : 280
downloaded 339 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments


Recent Judgments :

  1. Forest Development Tax Demand, Collection and Refund Subject to Final Outcome of Pending Cases
  2. SC : Extended Limitation Cannot Be Invoked Where Department Was Aware of Valuation Facts
  3. SC : Selling Shares While in Possession of UPSI Constitutes Insider Trading Even if No Profit Is Made
  4. SC : Laser Imagers Compatible with Machines Under Different Tariff Headings Classifiable Under CTH 9033
  5. Education Consultancy Services to Foreign Universities Not Intermediary Services; Refund of IGST on Export of Services Allowed
  6. Penalty Cannot Be Confirmed Beyond What is Specified in Statutory Form GST DRC-01
  7. Non-Supply of Field Visit Report Vitiates Rejection of Revocation Application
  8. Alternative Remedy before GSTAT to be Exhausted Despite Allegation that Adjudication Travelled Beyond SCN
  9. ITAT Jodhpur: AO Allows ₹2.61 Crore Deduction under Sections 54EC and 54F; Assessee's Appeal Dismissed as Infructuous
  10. CESTAT Revokes Suspension of Customs Broker Licence for Non-Compliance with Mandatory 15-Day Hearing Requirement

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member NIKHIL GUPTANIKHIL GUPTAPro Member Sreekumar J PaiSreekumar J PaiPro Member Sandeep RanjanSandeep RanjanPro Member CA. Urmila MahalwalCA. Urmila MahalwalPro Member Jai SolankiJai Solanki
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category