ITO, WARD - 1(1),, KALYAN SHRI AJAY RAGHUNATH PATIL, BHIWANDI

Last updated: 10 December 2020
Quick Summary
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has dismissed an appeal filed by the Revenue against Shri Ajay Raghunath Patil. The dismissal was based on the tax effect being below the Rs. 50 lakh limit stipulated by CBDT Circular No. 17/2019. This circular, applicable to pending cases, states that no appeal should be filed by the revenue if the tax effect is below this amount. The Tribunal noted that the Revenue may file a miscellaneous application to recall the order if they can provide evidence that the case falls under any exceptions mentioned in the circular.

Court :
ITAT Mumbai

Brief :
The Revenue has filed an appeal against the order of CIT(A)-2, Mumbai passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Citation :
ITA No. 3688/Mum/2019

Daily Limit Reached

You have reached your daily limit of 2 Free Judgements

Subscribe to CCI PRO for unlimited access

Why Upgrade to CCI PRO?
  • No Ads
  • WhatsApp Broadcasts
  • Daily E-Newsletter
  • Unlimited Judgements Access
BEST VALUE
2 YEAR PLAN
3,499
(Inclusive of GST)
1 YEAR PLAN
1,999
(Inclusive of GST)
View all CCI PRO benfits

Already a PRO member? Login here for an ad-free experience.

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 131
downloaded 210 times
Share Report Abuse
Comments

Join CAclubindia WhatsApp Finance Community & stay updated with the latest TAX news, compliance alerts and important updates all in one place!

Recent Judgments :

  1. No 10% pre-deposit required on any Penalty-only order from SCN issued prior to October 01, 2025
  2. Ratification is no substitute for recommendation - Notifications travelling beyond GST Council recommendations are ultra vires
  3. Disparity between seigniorage fee paid and supply value declared in GSTR-1 justifies invocation of extended period of limitation under Section 74 of the CGST Act
  4. Interest on Delayed Payment of GST Arises by Operation of Law and Cannot be Waived by Courts
  5. Supreme Court to examine whether the six-month time limit for issuance of show cause notice under Section 74(2) of the CGST Act is mandatory or directory
  6. Advocates ought to be summoned only in rare and exceptional circumstances
  7. Unsigned Assessment Order in Form GST DRC-07 is Invalid as Absence of the Assessing Officer's Signature is an Incurable Jurisdictional Defect
  8. SC to examine whether an assessee can be relegated to the appellate remedy, when the challenge is to a binding Circular
  9. Mere Expiry of E-Way Bill Without Intent to Evade Tax Cannot Justify 200% Penalty
  10. No GST Levy on Assignment of Leasehold Rights of Industrial Plots as Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's SLPs

View More Judgments »


Trending Online Classes

view all classess

CCI Pro
Meet our CAclubindia PRO Members
Pro Member ashvini tripathiashvini tripathiPro Member Credible HRMCredible HRMPro Member atul kumar soniatul kumar soniPro Member Subbiah SSubbiah SPro Member AMAR MEHARWADEAMAR MEHARWADE
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals

Browse by Category




Follow