Goods and conveyance detained will be released upon payment of penalty and furnishing of a bank guarantee


Quick Summary
The Gujarat High Court has ruled that goods and the conveyance used for their transport can be released upon payment of a penalty and provision of a bank guarantee. In this case, Ravi Trading Co. was required to pay a penalty of INR 93,750 and provide a bank guarantee of INR 19,68,750 in lieu of confiscation. Failure to meet these conditions would revoke the interim relief granted.

Court :
Gujarat High Court

Brief :
The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in Ravi Trading Co. v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax [SCA no. 6407 of 2023 dated May 4, 2023] directed the Revenue Authority to release goods on conditions that the assessee deposits a certain amount of penalty towards tax in lieu of confiscation of conveyance and furnish bank guarantee in lieu of confiscation of goods.

Citation :
SCA no. 6407 of 2023 dated May 4, 2023

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in Ravi Trading Co. v. Deputy Commissioner of State Tax [SCA no. 6407 of 2023 dated May 4, 2023] directed the Revenue Authority to release goods on conditions that the assessee deposits a certain amount of penalty towards tax in lieu of confiscation of conveyance and furnish bank guarantee in lieu of confiscation of goods.

Facts

The Revenue Department ("the Respondent") seized the goods of Ravi Trading Co. ("the Petitioner") while they were being transported in a conveyance with registration number MH-50-2399. The goods were seized under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ("the CGST Act"). Additionally, the Respondent issued an order dated April 09, 2023, GST MOV-11, under Section 130 of the CGST Act.

Issue

Whether goods can be released by furnishing a bank guarantee and conveyance by paying the required penalty?

Held

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in SCA no. 6407 of 2023 held as under:

  • Directed that, the goods of the Petitioner as well as vehicle bearing registration MH-50-2399, will be released subject to the following conditions,
  • The Petitioner must pay a penalty of INR 93,750 to the authorities as the tax remains unassessed.
  • The Petitioner should provide a Bank Guarantee of INR 19,68,750 as a fine in lieu of confiscating the goods.
  • Additionally, the Petitioner must deposit INR 93,750 as a fine instead of confiscating the conveyance.
  • Held that, the goods and the vehicle both shall be released by the authority. Further, non-compliance with any of the aforementioned conditions by the Petitioner, shall render the interim relief granted earlier being revoked.

Further, the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court tagged the present Petition with Special Civil Application No. 8353 of 2022.

Relevant Provisions

Section 129 (3) of the CGST Act

"Detention, seizure and release of goods and conveyances in transit

(3) The proper officer detaining or seizing goods or conveyance shall issue a notice within seven days of such detention or seizure, specifying the penalty payable, and thereafter, pass an order within a period of seven days from the date of service of such notice, for payment of penalty under clause (a) or clause (b) of sub-section (1).”

Section 130 (2) of the CGST Act

"Confiscation of goods or conveyances and levy of penalty

(2) Whenever confiscation of any goods or conveyance is authorised by this Act, the officer adjudging it shall give to the owner of the goods an option to pay in lieu of confiscation, such fine as the said officer thinks fit:

Provided that such fine leviable shall not exceed the market value of the goods confiscated, less the tax chargeable thereon:

Provided further that the aggregate of such fine and penalty leviable shall not be less than the penalty equal to hundred per cent. of the tax payable on such goods:

Provided also that where any such conveyance is used for the carriage of the goods or passengers for hire, the owner of the conveyance shall be given an option to pay in lieu of the confiscation of the conveyance a fine equal to the tax payable on the goods being transported thereon."

FAQ :

The Gujarat High Court directed the Revenue Authority to release the goods and the vehicle upon the assessee depositing a penalty and furnishing a bank guarantee.

Ravi Trading Co. had to pay a penalty of INR 93,750 and provide a bank guarantee of INR 19,68,750 as a fine in lieu of confiscating the goods. Additionally, a deposit of INR 93,750 was required instead of confiscating the conveyance.

The goods were seized under Section 129 of the CGST Act, and an order under Section 130 of the CGST Act was also issued.

If the petitioner (Ravi Trading Co.) fails to comply with any of the specified conditions, the interim relief granted by the court will be revoked.

 

Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 257

Comments




CCI Pro