This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 28.06.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2014-2015. The order of the CIT(A) arises out of the order of the Assessing Officer passed u/s 154 of the I.T.Act.
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the CIT(A)’s order dated 06.06.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2007-2008.
These appeals at the instance of various assessees are directed against different orders of the CIT(A). The relevant assessment year is 2006-2007.
These appeals at the instance of various assessees are directed against different orders of the CIT(A). The relevant assessment year is 2006-2007.
These appeals at the instance of various assessees are directed against different orders of the CIT(A). The relevant assessment year is 2006-2007.
These appeals at the instance of various assessees are directed against different orders of the CIT(A). The relevant assessment year is 2006-2007
These appeals at the instance of various assessees are directed against different orders of the CIT(A). The relevant assessment year is 2006-2007.
Thus, as agreed by the ld.representatives, we have heard first proposition canvassed by the ld.counsel for the assessees on 25.8.2020. The issue under the first proposition is, whether the proceedings initiated under section 153C are valid? According
F. No. 7/5/2020-DGTR.—Having regard to the Customs Tariff Act 1975 as amended (hereinafter referred as the ―Act‖) and the Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti-Dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Inju
The Hon’ble Appellate Authority, GST, Andhra Pradesh, in Re:Vaachi International Pvt. Ltd. [Order No. 4990 of 2020dated February 10, 2020] held that the SEZ unit/developers shall not claim any refund against input tax credit ("ITC") involved in suppl