Mr. Narayanappa S/o Late Balegara Earappa, Bengaluru Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward- 9(3), Bangalore

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
BANGALORE BENCHES “SMC-A”, BANGALORE

Before Shri George George K, Judicial Member

ITA No.2485/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2006-2007

Late Smt.Gowramma By L/H Sri.Narayanappa Masthenahalli Village Hennagara Post – 560 105 Anekal Taluk Bengaluru Rural District PAN : ASKPN3539P.
(Appellant) 

vs.

The Income Tax Officer Ward 9(3) / 4(3)(5) Bengaluru.
(Respondent)

ITA No.2486/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2006-2007

Sri.Narayanappa S/o.Late Balegara Earappa Masthenahalli Village Hennagara Post – 560 105 Anekal Taluk Bengaluru Rural District PAN : ASKPN3539P.
(Appellant) 

vs.

The Income Tax Officer Ward 9(3) / 4(3)(5) Bengaluru.
(Respondent)

ITA No.2487/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2006-2007

Late Sri.Venakataramaiah By L/H Sri.Narayanappa Masthenahalli Village Hennagara Post – 560 105 Anekal Taluk Bengaluru Rural District PAN : ASKPN3539P.
(Appellant) 

vs.

The Income Tax Officer Ward 9(3) / 4(3)(5) Bengaluru.
(Respondent)

ITA No.2488/Bang/2019 : Asst.Year 2006-2007

Late Sri.Chinnappa By L/H Sri.Narayanappa Masthenahalli Village Hennagara Post – 560 105 Anekal Taluk Bengaluru Rural District PAN : ASKPN3539P.
(Appellant) 

vs.

The Income Tax Officer Ward 9(3) / 4(3)(5) Bengaluru.
(Respondent)

ITA Nos.2485-2489/Bang/2019

Late Sri.Ashoka By L/H Sri.Narayanappa Masthenahalli Village Hennagara Post – 560 105 Anekal Taluk Bengaluru Rural District PAN : ASKPN3539P.
(Appellant) 

vs.

The Income Tax Officer Ward 9(3) / 4(3)(5) Bengaluru.
(Respondent)

Appellant by : Sri.Ningoji Rao, CA
Respondent by : Sri.Ganesh R.Ghale,
Standing Counsel for Department
Date of Hearing : 18.11.2020
Date of
Pronouncement : 18.11.2020

O R D E R

These appeals at the instance of various assessees are directed against different orders of the CIT(A). The relevant assessment year is 2006-2007.

2. The learned Counsel for the assessee has furnished letters dated 18th November, 2020, wherein it is stated that the assessees have filed applications under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act for settlement of the dispute and Form No.3 is awaited. It was further stated that the appeals may be treated as withdrawn with liberty to apply for a recall, if Form 1 & 2 filed by the assessees are not accepted by the Department for
any reason.

3. The learned Departmental Representative was duly heard.4. I have heard the rival submissions and perused the material on record. In view of the submission of the learned Counsel for the assessee in his letter dated 18.11.2020, I dismissed the appeals as withdrawn. The assessees are given liberty to move appropriate application for recalling the present order in accordance with law, if the assessees intend to do so.

To know more in details find the attachment file