The appellant M/s. ACME Warehousing Private Ltd. has filed thisintra court writ appeal, only aggrieved by the observation of the learnedSinge Judge in paragraph 2 of the order dated 25.08.2020 made in W.P.No.8086 of 2020.
(Judgment of the court was made by Dr.VINEET KOTHARI, J.)The present Appeals are squarely covered by the decision of this Courtin PVR Ltd. v. CTO (W.A.No.685, 694 to to 697 decided on 15.10.20020) which dealt with the question of taxability of the En
PRAYER IN W.A.No.582 of 2020: This Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters of Patent to set aside the order dated 11.06.2019 made in W.P.No.34079 of 2007.
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the Assessment Order Dt.30.12.2016. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of ld. ACIT, Circle 7(1)(2), Bangalore.
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the assessmentorder passed by AO for the assessment year 2013-14 in pursuanceof directions given by Ld Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP).
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Bangalore Dt.09.11.2018. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of ld. CIT (Appeals).
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the assessment order dated 14-09-2018 passed by the Assessing Officer for assessment year 2014-15 u/s 143(3) r.w.s.92CA r.w.s.144C(13) ofthe Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short] in pursuance of dire
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directedagainst CIT(A)’s order dated 20.02.2019. The relevant assessment year is 2014-2015.
This appeal is by the assessee directed against the Order of CIT(A) dated 11.07.2015. The assessee raised the following grounds:
The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated21-08-2019 passed by Ld CIT(A)-1, Bengaluru and it relates to the assessment year 2011-12.
LIVE Course on GSTR-9 & GSTR-9C (Technical | Practical | Concept - Based)