Shri Krishna Solvent Extruction (P) Ltd., Bhubaneswar vs DCIT, Central- 1(2), Bhubaneswar


Quick Summary
This Income Tax Appellate Tribunal case involves Shri Krishna Solvent Extruction (P) Ltd. appealing against an order from the CIT(A). The primary grounds for appeal relate to the sustainment of an addition of Rs. 22.50 lakhs under Section 68, which the assessee claims was an opening balance from a previous year. Additionally, the company contests the disallowance of Rs. 19.5 lakhs received as share capital, arguing that the transaction's genuineness and the investor's creditworthiness were adequately proven with supporting documentation.

Court :
ITAT Cuttack Bench

Brief :
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-1, Bhubaneswar dated 28.3.2019 for the assessment year 2015-16. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds:

Citation :
ITA No.271/CTK/2019

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK

BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA MOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

ITA No.271/CTK/2019
Assessment Year : 2015-16

Shri Krishna Solvent Extruction
(P) Ltd., 11, 2nd floor, Deendayal
Bhawan, Janpath, Ashok Nagar,
Bhubaneswar.
(Appellant) .. 

Vs. 

DCIT, Circle -1(2),
Bhubaneswar.
PAN/GIR No.AAGCVS 8521 F
( Respondent)

Assessee by : Shri Binod Agarwal, AR
Revenue by : Shri Subhendu Dutta, DR

Date of Hearing : 09 /12/ 2020
Date of Pronouncement : 10 /12/2020

O R D E R

Per C.M.Garg,JM

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-1, Bhubaneswar dated 28.3.2019 for the assessment year 2015-16. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds:

“That the Ld CIT (A) is not justified to sustain the addition made u/s 68 for Rs. 22.50 lakhs. The same being opening balance as on Dt. 01.04.2014 has been received in earlier years and hence not liable to addition in the current year either as protective or otherwise.

2. That the Ld CIT (A) has erred in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 19.5 lacks which were received as share capital during the assessment Year- 2015-16 by completely disregarding the documents filed during assessment proceedings. The Ld CIT (A) failed to appreciate the fact that the source/investor company confirmed the transaction in response to AO's notice issued u/s 133(6) and the appellant too had submitted the source of the source. That the Audited balance sheet oi M/s Inland Suppliers clearly showed that the Net Worth of the company was 301 lacks since 2010 and hence it is absolutely wrong to say that the creditworthiness was not established. Besides, the company had also substantiated die genuineness of the transaction. The addition being out of surmise & suspicions is liable to deleted.

To know more in details find the attachment file
 

FAQ :

The main issues are the sustainment of an addition of Rs. 22.50 lakhs under Section 68 and the disallowance of Rs. 19.5 lakhs received as share capital during the assessment year 2015-16.

The assessee argues that this amount was the opening balance as of 01.04.2014, received in earlier years, and therefore should not be liable for addition in the current assessment year.

The assessee provided documents including confirmation from the investor company in response to a notice, the source of the source, and the audited balance sheet of M/s Inland Suppliers showing a net worth of Rs. 301 lakhs since 2010.

The assessment year for this appeal was 2015-16.

The parties involved were Shri Krishna Solvent Extruction (P) Ltd. (Appellant) and the DCIT, Circle -1(2), Bhubaneswar (Respondent).

 

Guest
Published in Income Tax
Views : 92
downloaded 256 times

Comments




CCI Pro



Follow